The majority of therapy programs for people who stutter are aimed at modifying the entire speech output by using techniques that reduce the overt signature events. Use of these techniques for extended time periods are thought to induce true fluency that is automatic, natural, and effortless. It is proposed that the present form of therapeutic intervention induces pseudofluency rather than true fluency. Pseudofluency is the speech posttherapy of persons who stutter, free of the discrete signature events of stuttering, but replaced by cognitively mediated gestures that are embedded as continuous prolongation or masked stuttering events throughout the speech act. This may account for the high rate of relapse and the problems associated with the maintenance, stability, and naturalness of speech after stuttering therapy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsG.CraigA. (1988) Prediction of outcome after treatment for stuttering. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 236–240.
2.
BarberV. (1939) Studies in the psychology of stuttering: XV. Chorus reading as a distraction in stuttering. Journal of Speech Disorders, 4, 371–383.
3.
BloodsteinO. (1995) A handbook on stuttering. (5th ed.) San Diego, CA: Singular Publ. Group.
4.
BobercE.KullyD. (1994) Long-term results of an intensive treatment program for adults and adolescents who stutter. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1050–1059.
5.
CherryE.SayersB. (1956) Experiments upon total inhibition of stammering by external control and some clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1, 233–246.
6.
ContureE. G. (1990) Stuttering. (2nd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
CooperE. B. (1986) Treatment of disfluency: Future trends. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 11, 317–328.
8.
CooperE. B. (1993a) Chronic perseverative stuttering syndrome: A harmful or helpful construct?American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2, 11–15.
9.
CooperE. B. (1993b) Red herrings, dead horses, straw men, and blind alleys: Escaping the stuttering conundrum. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 18, 375–387.
10.
CordesA. K. (1998) Current status of stuttering treatment literature. In CordesA. N.InghamR. J. (Eds.), Treatment efficacy for stuttering: A search for empirical bases. San Diego, CA: Singular Publ. Croup. Pp. 117–144.
11.
CraigA. R. (1998) Relapse following treatment for stuttering: A critical review and correlative data. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 23, 1–30.
12.
CraigA. R.CalverP. (1991) Following up on treated stutterers: Studies of perceptions of fluency and job status. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 279–284.
13.
CraicA. R.HancockK. (1995) Self-reported factors related to relapse following treatment for stuttering. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 23, 48–60.
14.
CraigA. R.HancockK.ChangE.McCreadyC.ShepleyA.McCaulA.CostelloD.HardingS.KehrenR.MaselC.ReillyK. (1996) A controlled clinical trial for stuttering in persons aged 9 to 14 years. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 808–826.
15.
DayaluV. N.KalinowskiJ. (in press) Stuttering therapy results in pseudofluency. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders.
16.
DayaluV. N.SaltuklarogluT.KalinowsktJ.StuartA.RastatterM. P. (in press) Stuttering: The solution rather than the problem. Neuroscience Letters.
17.
FrankenC. F.BovesL.PetersH. F. M.WebsterR. L. (1992) Perceptual evaluation of the speech before and after fluency shaping therapy. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 17, 223–241.
18.
FrankenM. C. (1987) Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of stuttering therapy. In PetersH. F. M.HultstijnW. (Eds.). Speech motor dynamics in stuttering. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 285–294.
19.
GraccoV. L. (1991) Sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor control. In PetersH. F. M.HulstijnW.StarkweatherC. W. (Eds.), Speech motor control and stuttering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ. Pp. 53–76.
20.
GuitarB.BassC. (1978) Stuttering therapy: The relation between attitude change and long-term outcome. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 43, 392–400.
21.
HamR. E. (1990) Therapy of stuttering: Preschool through adolescence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
HancockK.CraigA. (1998) Predictors of stuttering relapse one year following treatment for children aged 9 to 14 years. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 23, 31–48.
23.
HargraveS.KalinowskiJ.StuartA.ArmsonJ.JonesK. (1994) Stuttering reduction under frequency altered feedback at two speech rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1313–1320.
24.
HarrisonE.OnslowM.AndrewsC.PackmanA.WebberM. (1998) Control of stuttering with prolonged speech: Preliminary outcome of a one-day instatement program. In CordesA. N.InghamR. J. (Eds.), Treatment efficacy for stuttering: A search for empirical bases. San Diego, CA: Singular Publ Group. Pp. 191–212.
25.
HowieP. M.TannerS.AndrewsG. (1981) Short- and long-term outcome in an intensive treatment program for adult stutterersJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 104–109.
26.
InghamR. J.AndrewsG. (1973) Behavior therapy and stuttering: A review. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 405–441.
27.
InghamR. J.GowM.CostelloJ. M. (1985) Stuttering and speech naturalness: Some additional data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 217–219.
28.
JohnsonW. (1946) People in quandaries. New York: Harper.
29.
KalinowskiA.KalinowskjJ.StuartA.RastatterM. P. (1998) A latent trait approach to the development of persistent stuttering. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 623–633.
30.
KalinowskjJ.ArmsonJ.Roland-MieszkowskiM.StuartA.GraccoV. L. (1993) Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Language and Speech, 36, 1–16.
31.
KalinowskiJ.DayaluV. N. (in press) A common element in the immediate inducement of effortless, natural-sounding, fluent speech in stutterers: “the second speech signal”. Medical Hypothogesis.
32.
KalinowskiJ.DayaluV. N.StuartA.RastatterM. P.RamiM. K. (2000) Stutter-free and stutter-filled speech signals and their role in stuttering amelioration for English speaking adults. Neuroscience Letters, 293, 115–118.
33.
KalinowskjJ.NobleS.ArmsonJ.StuartA. (1994) Naturalness ratings of the pretreatment and post-treatment speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 61–66.
34.
KalinowskjJ.StuartA.RastatterM. P.SnyderG.DayaluV. N. (2000) Inducement of fluent speech in persons who stutter via visual choral speech. Neuroscience Letters, 281. 198–200.
35.
KalinowskiJ.StuartA.SarkS.ArmsonJ. (1996) Stuttering amelioration at various auditory feedback delays and speech rates. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 259–269.
36.
MallardA. R.KelleyJ. S. (1982) The Precision Fluency Shaping program: Replication and evaluation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 7, 287–294.
37.
MallardA. R.WestbrookJ. B. (1985) Vowel duration in stutterers participating in Precision Fluency Shaping. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10, 221–228.
38.
MartinR. R.HaroldsonS. K.TridenK. A. (1984) Stuttering and speech naturalness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 53–58.
39.
MetzD. E.OnufrakJ. A.OgburnR. S. (1979) An acoustic analysis of stutterers' speech prior to and at the termination of speech therapy. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 4, 249–254.
40.
MetzD. E.SamarV. J.SaccoP. R. (1983) Acoustic analysis of stutterers' fluent speech before and after therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 531–536.
41.
MetzD. E.SchiavettiN.SaccoP. R. (1990) Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 516–525.
42.
OnslowM.CostaL.AndrewsC.HarrisonE.PackmanA. (1996) Speech outcomes of a prolonged-speech treatment for stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 734–749.
43.
OnslowM.HayesB.HutchinsL.NewmanD. (1992) Speech naturalness and prolonged-speech treatments for stuttering: Further variables and data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 274–282.
44.
OnslowM.InghamR. J. (1987) Speech quality measurement and the management of stuttering. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 2–17.
45.
OnufrakJ. A. (1980) A follow-up analysis of stutterers' speech after successful speech therapy. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Detroit, MI, November.
46.
PackmanA.OnslowM.MenziesR. (2000) Novel speech patterns and the treatment of stuttering. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 65–79.
47.
PerkinsW. H. (1973a) Replacement of stuttering with normal speech: I. Rationale. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 283–294.
48.
PerkjnsW. H. (1973b) Replacement of stuttering with normal speech: II. Clinical procedures. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 295–303.
49.
PerkinsW. H. (1984) Stuttering as a categorical event: Barking up the wrong tree—a reply to Wingate. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 431–433.
50.
PrinsD. (1970) Improvement and regression in stutterers following short-term intensive therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 35, 123–135.
51.
ProsekR. A.RunyanC. (1982) Temporal characteristics related to the discrimination of stutterers' and nonstutterers' speech samples. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 29–33.
52.
RamigP. R. (1984) Rate changes in the speech of stutterers after therapy. Journal of Fluency Disorders9285–294.
53.
RobbM. P.LyboltJ. T.PriceH. A. (1985) Acoustic measures of stutterers' speech following an intensive therapy program. Journal of fluency Disorders, 10, 269–279.
54.
RunyanC. M.AdamsM. R. (1978) Perceptual study of the speech of “successfully therapeutized” stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 3, 25–39.
55.
RunyanC. M.AdamsM. R. (1979) Unsophisticated judges' perceptual evaluations of the speech of “successfully treated” stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 4, 29–38.
56.
RunyanC. M.BellJ. N.ProsekR. A. (1990) Speech naturalness ratings of treated stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 434–438.
57.
SamarV. J.MetzD. E.SaccoP. R. (1986) Changes in aerodynamic characteristics associated with therapy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 29, 106–113.
58.
SchmidtR. A. (1982) More on motor programs. In KelsoJ. A. (Ed.), Human motor behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 189–217.
59.
ShenkerR. C.FinnP. (1985) An evaluation of effects of supplemental “fluency” training during maintenance. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10, 257–267.
60.
SiegelG. M.HansonE. (1972) The effect of response-contingent neutral stimuli on normal speech disfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 123–133.
61.
StarkweatherC. W. (1987) Fluency and stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
62.
StelmachG. E. (1982) Motor control and motor learning: The closed-loop perspective. In KelsoJ. A. (Ed.), Human motor behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 80–95.
63.
StoryR. S. (1990) A pre- and post-therapy comparison of articulatory, laryngeal, and respiratory kinematics of stutterers' fluent speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Connecticut, Storrs.
64.
Van RiperC. (1973) The treatment of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
65.
WebsterR. L. (1979) Empirical considerations regarding stuttering therapy. In GregoryH. H. (Ed.), Controversies about stuttering therapy. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. Pp. 209–240.
66.
WhiteC.KalinowskiJ.ArmsonJ. (1995) Clinicians' naturalness ratings of stutterers' speech under auditory feedback conditions. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association, Orlando, FL, December.
67.
WingateM. E. (1976) Stuttering: Theory and treatmentNew York: Irvington.
68.
WoolfG. (1967) The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 2,158–178.
