Using a manipulative approach in a mathematics course, this study was designed to assess attitudes toward mathematics of undergraduates in elementary education. A 20-item attitude rating administered as pre- and posttest to 95 students (7 men and 88 women) was used to assess the effect of the hands-on approach. A dependent t test indicated a statistically significant but very small change in their ratings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. R. (1972) Research on attitudes toward mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 19, 229–234.
2.
GorsuchR. L. (1983) Factor analysis. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
KarpK. S. (1991) Elementary school teachers' attitudes toward mathematics: The impact on students' autonomous learning skills. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 265–270.
4.
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS, COMMISSION ON STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL MATHEMATICS. (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
5.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. (1989) Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
PayneJ. N. (Ed.) (1990) Mathematics for the young child. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7.
PiagetJ. (1973) To understand is to invent: The future of education. (RobertsG. A., Transl.) New York: Grossman.
8.
PutneyL. D.CassM. (1998) Preservice teacher attitudes toward mathematics: Improvement through a manipulative approach. College Student Journal, 32, 626–632.
9.
SowellE. J. (1989) Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 498–505.
10.
UnglaubK. W. (1997) Mathematics anxiety in preservice elementary school teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 18, 68–74.
