Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the effects of background field-of-view and depth-plane on the oculogyral illusion. Seven subjects viewed a stationary fixation stimulus during the postrotatory interval following a 45-sec. constant-velocity chair rotation. The duration of the illusory movement of the fixation stimulus during the postrotatory interval was measured, along with the duration of the illusion of whole-body rotation (known as the somatogyral illusion) and the duration of the subject's slow-phase vestibular nystagmus. Subjects viewed the fixation stimulus by itself in a No-background condition or when surrounded by six background fields formed by the combination of two fields-of-view (35° and 115°) and three depth-planes (near, coplanar, and far). The different background fields inhibited the oculogyral illusion relative to the No-background condition but did not differ statistically from each other. The somatogyral durations better matched the oculogyral ones than did nystagmus decay, especially when a background field was present. These results suggest that the oculogyral illusion is more related to the experience of whole-body rotation than to oculomotor mechanisms and that the inhibitory effect of a background scene is only modestly affected by its field-of-view and depth-plane.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brandt

Dichgans

Koenig

(1973) Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 16, 476–491.

Brandt

Wist

E. R.

Dichgans

(1975) Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 497–503.

Brown

J. H.

Crampton

G. H.

(1966) Concomitant visual stimulation does not alter habituation of nystagmic, oculogyral or psychophysical responses to angular acceleration. Acta Otolaryngologica, 61, 80–91.

Byford

G. H.

(1963) Eye movements and the optogyral illusion. Aerospace Medicine, 33, 119–123.

Delorme

Martin

(1986) Roles of retinal periphery and depth periphery in linear vection and visual control of standing in humans. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 176–187.

Dunnett

C. W.

(1955) A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several means to a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096–1121.

Engelken

E. J.

Stevens

K. W.

(1990) A new approach to the analysis of nystagmus: An application for order-statistic filters. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 61, 859–864.

Engelken

E. J.

Stevens

K. W.

McQueen

W. J.

(1996) Applications of robust data processing methods to the analysis of eye movements. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 32, 7–12.

Evanoff

J. N.

Lackner

J. R.

(1987) Influence of maintained ocular deviation on the spatial displacement component of the oculogyral illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 25–28.

10.

Graybiel

Hupp

D. I.

(1946) The oculogyral illusion: A form of apparent motion which may be observed following stimulation of the semicircular canals. Aviation Medicine, 17, 3–27.

11.

Hallpike

C. S.

Hood

J. D.

(1953) The speed of the slow component of ocular nystagmus induced by angular acceleration of the head. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 141, 216–230.

12.

Heckmann

Howard

I. P.

(1991) Induced motion: Isolation and dissociation of egocentric and vection-entrained components. Perception, 20, 285–305.

13.

Howard

I. P.

(1982) Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.

14.

Howard

I. P.

Gonzalez

E. G.

(1987) Human optokinetic nystagmus in response to moving binocularly disparate stimuli. Vision Research, 27, 1807–1816.

15.

Howard

I. P.

Heckmann

(1989) Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing displays. Perception, 18, 657–665.

16.

Keller

Henn

(1984) Self-motion sensation influenced by visual fixation. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 279–285.

17.

Ohmi

Howard

I. P.

Landolt

J. P.

(1987) Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception, 16, 17–22.

18.

Post

R. B.

Leibowitz

H. W.

(1985) A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception. Perception, 17, 631–643.

19.

Previc

F. H.

(1994) Inferring the visual reference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 324–325.

20.

Previc

E. H.

Donnelly

(1993) The effects of visual depth and eccentricity on manual bias, induced motion, and vection. Perception, 22, 929–945.

21.

Previc

F. H.

Kenyon

R. V.

Boer

E. R.

Johnson

B. H.

(1993) The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 93–107.

22.

Previc

F. H.

Neel

R. L.

(1995) The effects of visual surround eccentricity and size on manual and postural control. Journal of Vestibular Research, 5, 399–404.

23.

Van Dishoeck

H. A. F.

Spoor

Nijhoff

(1954) The optogyral illusion and its relation to the nymus of the eyes. Acta Otolaryngologica, 44, 597–607.

24.

Vogelsang

C. J.

(1961) The perception of a visual object during stimulation of the vestibular system. Acta Otolaryngologica, 53, 461–469.

25.

Whiteside

T. C. D.

Graybiel

Niven

J. I.

(1965) Visual illusions of movement. Brain, 88, 193–210.

26.

Winer

B. J.

(1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Effects of Background Field-of-View and Depth-Plane on the Oculogyral Illusion

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References