Many researchers have suggested that balance is not a general motor ability but rather is specific to the task which is performed. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between a laboratory test (stabilometer) for assessing dynamic balance and three field tests: the Modified Bass Test, Balance Beam Speed Test 1 (forward walking), and Balance Beam Speed Test 2 (sideward walking). In addition, associations of whole body reaction time with scores of the four tests of dynamic balance were assessed in 54 undergraduate students. Pearson coefficient of determination indicated no significant correlation between the time participants were in balance on the stabiiometer and on any of the three field tests. Body reaction time was significantly correlated with scores on the four tests. These results give further support to the specific character of dynamic balance since all tests seemed to measure different aspects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgebergE.ZätterströmA. E.MoritzU. (1998) Stabilometry and one-leg hop have high test-retest reliability. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 8, 198–202.
2.
BaumgartnerT. A.JacksonA. S. (1995) Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science. (5th ed) Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
3.
BoswellB. (1991) Comparison of tuo methods of improving dynamic balance of mentally retarded children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 759–764.
4.
BoswellB. (1993) Effects of movement sequences and creative dance on balance of children with mental retardation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 1290.
5.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
DrowatzkyN. J.ZuccatoF. C. (1967) Interrelationships between selected measures of static and dynamic balance. Research Quarterly, 38, 509–510.
7.
EckertH. M.RarickG. L. (1976) Stabilometer performance of educable mentally retarded and normal children. Research Quarterly, 47, 619–623.
8.
ErbaughS. J. (1984) The relationship of stability performance and the physical growth characteristics of preschool children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 8–16.
9.
HusakW. S.MagillR. A. (1979) Correlations among perceptual-motor ability, self-concept and reading achievement in early elementary grades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 447–450.
10.
KinzeyS. J.ArmstrongC. W. (1998) The reliability of the star-excursion test in assessing dynamic balance. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 27, 356–360.
11.
KirkendallD.GruberJ.JohnsonR. (1987) Measurements and evaluation for physical educators. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
12.
McClenaghanB. A.WilliamsH. G. (1986) Design of an automated system to quantify dynamic balance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 78–81.
13.
McLeodB.HansenE. (1989) Effects of the eyerobics visual skills training program on static balance performance of male and female subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1123–1126.
14.
ParishW. (1990) An assessment of visual and nonvisual static balance of different ages as it relates to kinesthesis, leg strength, and leg responses speed. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Kansas, Lawrence.
15.
RibadiH.RideriR. A.TooleT. (1987) A comparison of static and dynamic balance in congenitally blind, sighted, and sighted blindfolded adolescents. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 220–225.
16.
SafritM.WoodT. (1995) Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
SanbornC.WyrickW. (1969) Prediction of Olympic balance beam performance from standardized and modified tests of balance. Research Quarterly, 40, 174–184.
18.
SchmidtR. (1991) Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19.
SingeriR. N. (1980) Motor learning and human performance. (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan.
20.
TabachnikB.FidellL. (1996) Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
21.
TravisR. (1945) An experimental analysis of dynamic and static equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 216–234.
22.
TsigilisN.DoudaE.MertzanidouO.SofiadisN. (1998) [The effect of the induced stimulation of the vestibular system on the balance ability of rhythmic sports gymnasts and female basketball players, aged 9–11]. [Exercise and Society: Journal of Sports Science], 19, 69–77. [in Greek].
23.
WoollacottM.TangP. F.LinS. I. (1999) Dynamic balance control in older adults: Does limited response capacity lead to falls? In GantchevN.GantchevG. N. (Eds.), From basic motor control to functional recovery: Concepts, theories and models present state and perspective. Sofia, Bulgaria: Prof. M. Drinov. 103–107.
24.
YoungW.WilsonG.ByrneC. (1999) Relationship between strength qualities and performance in standing and run-up vertical jumps. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 39, 285–293.
