The reflective-impulsive construct refers to responses made slowly or quickly in a situation with high uncertainty. Children who are labeled “reflective” take a longer time to respond and make few errors, whereas “impulsive” children are fast and inaccurate. Although the validity of the test and the definition of reflective-impulsive style are well accepted, whether such respond fast or slow to all tasks is questioned. Some children do not fit the dichotomy. Two other groups arise, the fast-accurate and the slow-inaccurate. The response styles of 86 boys, ages 5, 7, and 9 years performing a gross motor task, i.e., hitting a ball with a racquet, were studied. Analysis indicated that the slowest children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test can be faster than the fastest ones and remain more accurate. As the definition of the reflective-impulsive style is based on time, the reflective ones might better be viewed as children who can adapt the response time to the context and thus be more efficient at problem-solving.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AncillotiJ-P. (1985) Dimension reflexive-impulsive de la personnalité et fonctionnement cognitif. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 667–686.
2.
AultR. L. (1973) Problem-solving strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast accurate and slow inaccurate children. Child Development, 44, 259–266.
3.
AultR. L.MitchellC.HartmannD. P. (1976) Some methodological problems in reflection-impulsivity research. Child Development, 47, 227–231.
4.
BarrattE. S.PattonJ.OlssonN. G.ZukerG. (1981) Impulsivity and paced timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 286–300.
5.
BlockJ. (1987) Misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test: Premature or overdue. Developmental Psychology, 23, 740–741.
6.
BlockJ.GjerdeE. P.BlockJ. H. (1986) More misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity: Absence of construct validity in pre-adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 22, 820–831.
7.
BuckyS. F.BantaT. J.GrossR. B. (1972) Development of motor impulse control and reflectivity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 813–814.
8.
BushE. S.DweckC. S. (1975) Reflections on conceptual tempo: Relationship between cognitive style and performance as a function of task characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 11,567–574.
9.
CostantiniA. F.CorsiniD. A.DavisJ. E. (1973) Conceptual tempo, inhibition of movement, and acceleration of movement in 4-, 7-, and 9-yr.-old children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 779–784.
10.
Devard BrownS.LeeA. M. (1988) The interaction of conceptual tempo and modeling on the motor performance of 10- and 11-year-old children. In ClarkJ. E.HumphreyJ. H. (Eds.), Advances in motor development research 2. New York: A. M. S. Press. 103–114.
11.
DickmanS. J.MeyerD. E. (1988) Impulsivity and speed-accuracy tradeoffs in information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 274–290.
12.
EgelandB.WeinbergR. K. (1976) The Matching Familiar Figures Test: A look at its psychometric credibility. Child Development, 47, 483–491.
13.
JonesA. E. (1997) Reflection-impulsivity and wholist-analytic: Two fledglings? … or is R-I a cuckoo?Educational Psychology, 17, 65–77.
14.
KacanJ. (1965) Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 36, 609–628.
15.
KaganJ. (1966) Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17–24.
16.
KaganJ.RosmanB. L.DayD.AlbertJ.PhillipsW. (1964) Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 78, No. 1 (Whole No. 578).
17.
KilburgR. R.SiegelA. W. (1973) Differential feature analysis in the recognition memory of reflective and impulsive children. Memory & Cognition, 1, 413–419.
18.
LeeA.LandinD.GreenockleK. M.HillK.EdwardsR. V. (1987) Role of reflection-impulsivity in time to learn a sequential movement task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1144–1146.
19.
MeichenbaumD.GoodmanJ. (1969) Reflection-impulsivity and verbal control of motor behavior. Child Development, 40, 785–797.
20.
MeichenbaumD.GoodmanJ. (1971) Training impulsive children to talk to themselves. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 115–126.
21.
MitchellC.AultR. L. (1979) Reflection-impulsivity and the evaluation process. Child Development., 50, 1043–1049.
22.
OdomR. D.Mc IntyreC. W.NealeG. S. (1971) The influence of cognitive style on perceptual learning. Child Development, 42, 883–891.
23.
RidingR. J.GlassA.DouglasG. (1993) Individual differences in thinking: Cognitive and neurophysiological perspectives. Educational Psychology13, 267–279.
24.
SalkindN. J.NelsonC. F. (1980) A note on the developmental nature of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 16, 237–239.
25.
StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1996) Verbal skills, finger tapping and cognitive tempo define a second-order factor of temporal information processingBrain Research, 31, 35–45.
26.
VictorJ. B.HalversonC. F.MontagueR. B. (1985) Relations between reflection-impulsivity and behavioral impulsivity in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 21, 141–148.
27.
WrightJ. C. (1973) The KRISP: A technical report. St. Louis, MO: CERMEL, Inc.
28.
ZelnikerT.JeffreyW. (1976) Reflective and impulsive children: Strategies of information processing underlying differences in problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 41, No. 5 (Serial No. 168).
29.
ZelnikerT.JefferyW.AultR.ParsonsJ. (1972) Analysis and modification of search strategies of impulsive and reflective children on the MFF test. Child Development, 43, 321–335.
