Effects of stimulus-response compatibility and position of hands have previously been reported to be additive or interactive. It has been assumed in a recent model that, in some particular experimental paradigms, the presentation of the stimulus would activate two automatic responses. In the present study three theoretical limit cases of this model are investigated. The different sets of experimental data are consistent with the predicted values.
FittsP. M., & SeegerC. M. (1953) S–R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and responses codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.
3.
GhozlanA. (1997) Simon's experiments and stimulus-response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 35–45.
4.
GhozlanA. (1998) Stimulus-response compatibility and position of the hands: nonadditive effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 843–850.
5.
SimonJ. R.HinrichJ. V., & CraftJ. L. (1970) Auditory S–R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.
6.
StanovichK. E., & PachellaR. G. (1977) Encoding, stimulus-response compatibility and stages of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 411–421.
7.
SternbergS. (1969) The discovery of processing stages. Acta Psychologicn, 30, 276–315.
8.
WallaceR. J. (1971) S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.
