Evidence suggests that studies employing a wide range of task complexity may best show that measures of delayed knowledge of results, post-KR interval, and intertrial interval produce optimal performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmmonsR. B. (1956) Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 54, 279–299.
2.
BeckerP. W.MussinaC. M.PersonsR. W. (1963) Intertrial interval, delay of knowledge of results, and motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 559–563.
3.
BourneL. E.Jr.BundersonC. V. (1963) Effects of delay of information feedback and length of postfeedback interval on concept identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1–5.
4.
DennyM. R.AllardM.HallE.RokeachM. (1960) Supplementary report: Delay of knowledge of results, knowledge of task, and intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 327.
5.
SalmoniA. W.SchmidtR. A.WalterC. B. (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
6.
TravlosA. K. (1999) Re-examining the temporal locus of knowledge of results (KR): A self-paced approach to learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 1073–1087.
