The current study investigated vocal reaction times of 11 stuttering participants to verbs with high and low frequencies of occurrence when these verbs were unilaterally visually presented. No significant main effects or interactions between stimuli and visual-half field were found. Reaction times were 16 msec. faster after right visual-field presentations and the Pearson correlation coefficient between visual fields .71 (p=.02). These results were interpreted as suggesting that the left hemisphere was dominant for processing the current lexical items, findings which parallel those for normal speakers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnettM. (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 301–321.
2.
Cedrus Corp. (1990) Super Lab Pro. [Computer software]Phoenix, AZ: Author.
3.
DayJ. (1977) Right-hemisphere language processing in normal right-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 518–528.
4.
DayJ. (1979) Visual half-field word recognition as a function of syntactic class and imageability. Neuropsychologia, 17, 515–519.
5.
HandC. R.HaynesW. O. (1983) Linguistic processing and reaction time differences in stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 181–185.
6.
JohannsenH. S.VictorC. (1986) Visual information processing in the left and right hemispheres during unilateral tachistoscopic stimulation of stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 61, 285–291.
7.
KinsbourneM. (1975) Lateral interactions in the brain. In KinsbourneM.SmithW. L. (Eds.), Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Pp. 239–259.
8.
MoscovitchM. (1976) On interpreting data regarding the linguistic competence and performance of the right hemisphere: A reply to Seines. Brain and Language, 3, 590–599.
9.
RastatterM. P.DellC. (1987a) Simple visual versus lexical decision vocal reaction times of stuttering and normal subjects. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 12, 63–69.
10.
RastatterM. R.DellC. (1987b) Vocal reaction times of stuttering subjects to tachistoscopically presented concrete and abstract nouns: A closer look at cerebral dominance and language processing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 306–310.
11.
RastatterM. P.DellC. (1988) Reading reaction times of stuttering and nonstuttering subjects to unilaterally presented concrete and abstract words. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 13, 319–329.
12.
RastatterM. P.DellC. W.McGuireR.LorenC. (1987) Vocal reaction times to unilaterally presented concrete and abstract nouns: Some evidence for differential right hemisphere semantic processing. Cortex, 23, 135–145.
13.
RastatterM. P.LorenC. (1988) Vocal reaction times to tachistoscopically presented high- and low-frequency verbs: Some evidence for selective minor hemisphere linguistics analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 803–810.
14.
RastatterM. P.LorenC.ColcordR, (1987) Visual coding strategies and hemisphere dominance characteristics of stutterers. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 12, 305–315.
15.
RastatterM. P.McGuireR. A. (1990) Some effects of advanced aging on the visual-language processing capacity of the left and right hemispheres: Evidence from unilateral tachistoscopic viewing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 134–140.
16.
RastatterM. P.McGuireR. A.LorenC. (1988) Linguistic encoding dominance in stuttering: Some evidence for temporal and qualitative processing differences. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 13, 215–224.
17.
RastatterM. R.StuartA. (1995) Hemispheric picture-naming hierarchies in stuttering subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 899–908.
18.
ThorndikeE. L.LorgeI. (1944) The teachers' word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia Univer.
19.
ZaidelE. (1983) Disconnection syndrome as a model for laterality effects in the normal brain. In HeiligeJ. B. (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory and application. New York: Praeger. Pp. 95–151.
