Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine performance differences on a reaching and grasping task related to an activity of daily living. This involved either the anatomical limb or a simulated artificial limb. College-aged volunteers (2 men and 4 women), one of whom was left-handed, performed the reaching and grasping task. The apparatus, placed on a table before the seated participant, was a square wooden board which contained a starting key and holes for the insertion and removal of a small Fiberglas dowel. At the beginning of the trial the participant depressed the start key, reached forward and grasped the dowel, and then returned the dowel to a finishing hole located directly in front of the start key. The results of 2 (side) × 2 (type of limb) repeated-measures multivariate analyses of variance on the mean and standard deviation of the movement times showed a significant main effect for type of limb (Wilks Λ₃₃= .047 and .079, respectively, p<.05). Analyses of variance on mean total transport time, extension time, flexion time, and their standard deviations showed that times were slower and less consistent with the prosthesis for all measures. These results and those of later research should be focused on the development of training principles for both therapists and individuals with an amputation. In addition, the simulated prosthesis is an excellent experimental model for basic and clinical research in the control and acquisition of coordinated movement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bittermann

P. R.

(1968) An upper-extremity prosthesis for the non-amputee. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 23, 210.

Brammel

(1994) Personal communication. O.T.R., Director of Specialty Programs, Amputee Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Univer. of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

Carlson

L. E.

(1970) Below-elbow control of an externally powered hand. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, Fall, 43–61.

Childress

D. S.

(1992) Applying science to prosthetics and orthotics. (Report of a Research Planning Conference, Prosthetic and Orthotic Research for the Twenty-first Century). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Education. Pp. 7–14.

Magill

R. A.

(1998) Motor learning: Concepts and applications. Boston, MA: WCB-McGraw-Hill.

McKenzie

D. S.

(1970) Functional replacement of the upper extremity today. In Murdoch

(Ed.), Prosthetic and orthotic practice. London: Edward Arnold. Pp. 363–376.

Schmidt

R. A.

Young

D. E.

(1987) Transfer of movement control in motor skill learning. In Cormier

S. M.

Hagman

J. D.

(Eds.), Transfer of learning. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Pp. 47–79.

Wallace

S. A.

(1992) Temporal patterns of coordination in normal and prosthetic movements. Control and modulation of patterns of interlimb coordination: A multidisciplinary perspective. Paper presented at the Human Frontier Science Program, Leuven, Belgium.

Wallace

S. A.

Carlson

L. E.

(1991) Analysis of reaching and grasping patterns of motion in the voluntary-opening, artificial hand. Paper presented at the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity conference, Monterey, California.

10.

Wallace

S. A.

Carlson

L. E.

(1992) Critical variables in the coordination of prosthetic and normal limbs. In Stelmach

G. E.

Requin

(Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Pp. 321–341.

11.

Wallace

S. A.

Carlson

L. E.

Grammens

G. M.

(1990) Coordination of prosthetic and normal hands. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, Louisiana.

12.

Wallace

S. A.

Carlson

L. E.

McCullough

(1991) Relative phase and the coupling of the reach and grasp components in the prosthetic hand. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience, New Orleans, Louisiana.

13.

Wallace

S. A.

Foo

Weeks

D. L.

(1995) Identifying stable patterns of coordination in an upper extremity artificial limb. Paper presented at the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, California.

14.

Wilson

A. B.

(1970) Limb prosthetics—1970. Artificial Limbs, 14, 1–52.

Motor Performance with a Simulated Artificial Limb

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References