Further comments focus on the use of partial and anagram messages and the need for neutral stimuli in establishing subjective thresholds for subliminal psychodynamic activation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FudinR. (1986) Subliminal psychodynamic activation: MOMMY AND I ARE NOT YET ONE. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 1159–1179.
2.
GreenbergA. C. (1990) Response to subliminally activated fantasies of symbiotic-like oneness: A function of gender or psychological differentiation?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1179–1187.
3.
GreenbergA. C. (1992) Subliminal psychodynamic activation and annihilation anxiety: Preliminary findings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 219–225.
4.
GreenbergA. C. (1997) A comment regarding Malik, et al.'s (1996) “The method of subliminal psychodynamic activation: Do individual thresholds make a difference?”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1024–1026.
5.
MalikR. (1998) Reply to Greenberg's critique of Malik, et al.'s experiment on the method of subliminal psychodynamic activation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 313–314.
6.
MalikR.ParaherakjsA.JosephS.LaddH. (1996) The method of subliminal psychodynamic activation: Do individual thresholds make a difference?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 1235–1242.
7.
SilvermanL. H.LachmannF. M.MilichR. H. (1982) The search for oneness. New York: International Univer. Press.
