Responses to two forms of the answer sheet for the Speech-Sounds Perception Test, the standard form and a revised form in which the error types were randomized, were analyzed for 40 subjects. Although there was a statistically significant difference between the forms, practically it was negligible.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BornsteinR. A.LeasonM. (1984) Item analysis of Halstead's Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of errors. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 205–214.
2.
CharterR. A.DutraR. L.LopezM. N.Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Analysis of error types in normal and diffusely brain-damaged patients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1997, 1507–1510.
3.
ReddonJ. R.SchopflocherD.GillD. M.StefanykW. O. (1989) Speech-Sounds Perception Test: Nonrandom response locations form a logical fallacy in structure. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 235–240.
4.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1993) The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. (2nd ed.) Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
