Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This investigation examined the effect of manipulating different quantities of variable practice in the acquisition phase on the retention and transfer performance of a dart throw. Participants in the Specific condition practiced a total of 75 acquisition trials from a distance of 2.39 m. Participants in the Specific + Variable condition practiced a total of 75 acquisition trials with 25 trials from distances of 1.47 m, 2.39 m, and 3.30 m. Participants in the Specific + Varplus condition practiced a total of 75 acquisition trials with 15 trials from distances of 1.47 m, 1.93 m, 2.39 m, 2.84 m, and 3.30 m. Results of the one-way analysis of variance on the 24-hr. retention test from 2.39 m yielded no significant differences among practice conditions for mean radial error. A one-way analysis of variance on the 24-hr. transfer test from 3.76 m indicated that the Specific + Variable and Specific + Varplus conditions performed with significantly smaller mean radial error than the Specific condition. The results are discussed in regard to recent research and applicability to instructional settings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carson

L. M.

Wiegand

R. L.

(1979) Motor schema formation and retention in young children: A test of Schmidt's schema theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 247–251.

Catalano

J. F.

Kleiner

B. M.

(1984) Distant transfer in coincident timing as a function of variability of practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 851–856.

Hancock

G. R.

Butler

M. S.

Fischman

M. G.

(1995) On the problem of two-dimensional error scores: Measures and analyses of accuracy, bias, and consistency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 241–250.

Landin

D. K.

Hebert

E. P.

Fairweather

(1993) The effects of variable practice on the performance of a basketball skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 232–237.

Lee

T. D.

Magill

R. A.

Weeks

D. J.

(1985) Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283–299.

Moxley

S. E.

(1979) Schema: The variability of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 65–70.

Newell

K. M.

Shapiro

D. C.

(1976) Variability of practice and transfer of training: Some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 233–243.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

Shapiro

D. C.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1982) The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In Kelso

J. A. S.

Clark

J. E.

(Eds.), The development of movement control and coordination. New York: Wiley. Pp. 113–150.

10.

Shea

C. H.

Kohl

R. M.

(1990) Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 169–177.

11.

Van Rossum

J. H. A.

(1990) Schmidt's schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis, a critical review. Human Movement Science, 9, 387–435.

12.

Wrisserg

C. A.

Ragsdale

M. R.

(1979) Further test of Schmidt's schema theory: Development of a schema rule for coincident timing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 159–166.

Effect of Different Quantities of Variable Practice on Acquisition,Retention,and Transfer of An Applied Motor Skill

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References