This study examined the mobilizing feature of footedness in a unilateral and a bilateral context. Analysis for 47 right- and 32 left-footed undergraduates indicated a strong relationship between preferred limbs in both conditions, with right footers showing the strongest concordance. Theoretical explanations for the origin of behavior and differences in right versus left concordance are discussed. Based on selected previous reports and the present findings, it seems reasonable that for most persons the right foot may be preferred for mobilizing activities regardless of behavioral context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnettM. (1985) Left, right, band and brain: the right shift theory. London: Erlbaum.
2.
AnnettM. (1996) In defense of the right shift theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 115–137.
3.
ArmitageM., & LarkinD. (1993) Laterality, motor asymmetry and clumsiness in children. Human Movement Science, 12, 155–177.
4.
BorodJ. C.CaronH. S., & KoffE. (1984) Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 177–186.
5.
BrysbaertM. (1994) Lateral preferences and visual field asymmetries: appearances may have been overstated. Cortex, 30, 413–429.
6.
BubD. N., & LewineJ. (1988) Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields. Brain and Cogntion, 33, 161–188.
7.
CorballisM. C., & MorganM. J. (1978) On the biological basis of human laterality: I. Evidence for a maturational left-right gradient. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 2, 261–269.
8.
CorenS. (1993) The Lateral Preference Inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: norms for young adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 1–3.
9.
De AgnostiniM.ParéC.GoudotD., & DellatolasG. (1992) Manual preference and skill development in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 41–57.
10.
GabbardC., & HartS. (1996) A question of foot dominance. The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 289–296.
11.
GabbardC., & IteyaM. (1996) Foot laterality in children, adolescents and adults. Laterality, 1, 199–205.
12.
GanongW. F. (1993) Review of medical physiology. (16th ed.) Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
13.
HartS., & GabbardC. (1996) Bilateral footedness and task complexity. International Journal of Neuroscience, 88, 141–146.
14.
HartS., & GabbardC. (1997) Examining the stabilising characteristics of footedness. Laterality, 2, 17–26.
15.
HelligeJ. B. (1993) Hemispheric asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
16.
KatsaskasA.SmithH., & GalianaH. (1994) Postural instability on one foot in patients with loss of unilateral peripheral vestibular function. Journal of Vestibular Research, 4, 153–160.
17.
MacNeilageP. (1991) The “postural origins” theory of primate neurobiological asymmetries. In KrasnegorN.RumbaughD.Studdert-KennedyM., & SchiefelbuschR. (Eds.), The biological foundations of language development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 165–188.
18.
McManusI. C. (1985) Handedness, language dominance and aphasia: a genetic model. In Psychological Medicine, Monograph Supplement 8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
19.
NonisK. P. (1996) A mixed longitudinal study of the development of lower limb preference and hopping performance in girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Univer. of Western Australia.
20.
PetersM. (1988) Footedness: asymmetries in foot preference and skill and neuropsychological assessment of foot movement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 179–192.
21.
PrevicF. H. (1991) A general theory concerning the prenatal origins of cerebral lateralization in humans. Psychological Review, 98, 299–334.
22.
SeelyR. R.StephensT. D., & TateP. (1992) Anatomy and physiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
