The effects of warnings are analyzed using a distributed signal-detection theory model. It is established that selectivity always increases effectiveness. The implications to optimal warning design for intermittent versus continuous hazards are discussed. The changes in the behavior of the 6 human subjects in response to changes in the warning levels are consistent with the predictions of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreenD. M., & SwetsJ. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
2.
LehtoM. R., & MillerJ. M.Warnings: Vol. I. Fundamentals, design, and evaluation methodologies. Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical Publ., 1986.
3.
LehtoM. R., & PapastavrouJ. D.Models of the warning process: important implications towards effectiveness. Safety Science, 1993, 16, 569–595.
4.
PapastavrouJ. D., & AthansM.On optimal decision architectures in hypothesis testing environment. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1992, 37, 1154–1169.
5.
SlovicP.FischhoffB., & LichtensteinS.Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: a psychological perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1978, 10, 281–285.
