Differences in auditory evoked potentials with meaningful words and their reverse playback may reflect different neural processes in recognizing auditory Stimuli. Auditory evoked potentials with the words and their reverse playback were analyzed for eight volunteers, and a maximal difference was observed at a latency around 400 msec. over the left middle temporal central area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FerlazzoF.ConteS., & GentilomoA. (1993) Event-related potentials and recognition memory: the effects of word imagery value. Internal Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 115–122.
2.
KutasM., & HillyardS. A. (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.
3.
OldfieldR. C. (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
4.
ShimoyamaI.NakajiamaY.ItoT., & ShibataT. (1997) Visual evoked potentials relating to imagery: words for concrete objects versus absolute concepts. Brain Topography, 9, 271–274.
5.
StephensonW. A., & GibbsF. A. (1951) A balanced non-cephalic reference electrode. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 3, 237–240.