This paper discusses methodological concerns of using silhouette figures to measure body images. These include concerns related to scale coarseness (limiting response options to one of a finite number of drawings), restriction of range, method of presentation, and scale of measurement. Recommendations are made to address these limitations, and an alternative silhouette scale using continuous scale measurements is proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BobkoP., & RussellC. J. (1994) On theory, statistics, and the search for interactions in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 20, 193–200.
2.
BrodieD. A.BagleyK., & SladeP. D. (1994) Body-image perception in pre- and postadolescent females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 147–154.
3.
BrodieD. A.SladeP. D., & RoseH. (1989) Reliability measures in disturbing body image. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 723–732.
4.
CashT. F., & PruzinskyT. (1990) Body images: development, deviance and change. New York: Guilford.
5.
CohenJ. (1983) The cost of dischotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–253.
6.
GardnerR.FriedmanB., & JacksonN. (1997) Developmental aspects of children's body size estimations between ages six and thirteen. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
GardnerR., & MorrellJ. (1991) Body-size judgments and eye movements associated with looking at body regions in obese and normal weight subjects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 675–682.
8.
GardnerR.MorrellJ.WatsonD., & SandovalS. (1989) Eye movements and body size judgments in the obese. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 9, 537–544.
9.
GardnerR.SorterR., & FriedmanB. (1997) Development changes in children's body images. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, in press.
10.
GardnerR. M.MartinezR., & SandovalY. (1987) Obesity and body image: an evaluation of sensory and non-sensory components. Psychological Medicine, 17, 927–932.
11.
GescheiderG. A. (1976) Psychophysics: method and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
GlucksmanM., & HirschJ. (1969) The response of obese patients to weight reduction: III. The perception of body size. Psychosomatic Medicine, 31, 1–17.
13.
PoultonE. C. (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 777–803.
14.
RussellC. J., & BobkoP. (1992) Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: too coarse for comfort. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 336–342.
15.
RussellC. J.PintoJ. K., & BobkoP. (1991) Appropriate moderated regression and inappropriate research strategy: a demonstration of information loss due to scale coarseness. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 125–135.
16.
SladeP. D., & RussellG. F. M. (1973) Awareness of body dimensions in anorexia nervosa: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 3, 188–199.
17.
StunkardA. J.SorensonT., & SchlusingerF. (1983) Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. In KetyS. S.RowlandL. P.SidmanR. L., & MatthysseS. W. (Eds.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. New York: Raven. Pp. 115–120.
18.
ThompsonJ. K. (1995) Assessment of body image. In AllisonD. B. (Ed.), Handbook of assessment methods for eating behaviors and weight related problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 119–144.
19.
ThompsonJ. K., & SpanaR. E. (1988) The adjustable light beam method for the assessment of size estimation accuracy: description, psychometrics, and normative data. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 7, 521–526.
20.
ThompsonM. A., & GrayJ. J. (1995) Development and validation of a new body-image assessment scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 258–269.
21.
WilliamsonD. A.DavisC. J.BennettS. M.GorecznyA. J., & GleavesD. H. (1989) Development of a simple procedure for assessing body image disturbances. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 433–446.
