This report discusses the problems associated with the prevailing view chat the province of unconscious influence is highly restricted. It is argued that present empirical data neither strongly support nor argue against a circumscribed notion of the unconscious.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreenwaldA. G. (1992) New Look 3: unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766–779.
2.
GreekwaldA. G., & LiuT. (1985) Limited unconscious process of meaning. (Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State Univer.)
3.
KihlstromJ. F. (1993) The continuum of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 2, 334–354.
4.
MalikR. (1996) Effects of stimulating unconscious fantasies of oneness using the subliminal psychodynamic activation method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University.
5.
SilvermanL. H., & WeinbergerJ. (1985) MOMMY AND I ARE ONE: implications for psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 40, 1296–1308.
