Concurrent validity of scores of the Hemispheric Mode Indicator (a measure of cognitive hemispheric dominance) was assessed by product-moment correlation with scores for the Human Information Processing Survey (a more-studied measure of hemispheric dominance) for 27 nurse-anesthetist students and 94 medical students (r = .61 and .69, respectively). For 70 of the medical students, test-retest stability was only fair (r = .74). For 525 undergraduates and 156 medical students, although alpha coefficients were .78 and .84, respectively, consideration of interitem correlations and principal components analyses indicated that some of the Hemispheric Mode Indicator's items are unsuitable as worded and that the 32 items probably represent more than one underlying latent variable.
BeylerJ., & SchmeckR. R. (1992) Assessment of individual differences in preferences for holistic-analytic strategies: evaluation of some commonly available instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 709–719.
3.
BoyleG. J. (1991) Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 291–294.
4.
BriggsS. R., & CheekJ. M. (1986) The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106–148.
5.
CattellR. B. (1978) The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
6.
ClarkL. A., & WatsonD. (1995) Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.
7.
CohenJ. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
8.
CohenJ. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CohenJ. (1990) Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
10.
CorballisM. (1983) Human laterality. New York: Academic Press.
11.
CormanL. S.GuynesC. S., & VanecekM. T. (1994) A study of laterality and cognitive style in information systems and liberal arts students. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 35, 26–34.
12.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
13.
GeschwindN., & GalaburdaA. M. (1985) Cerebral lateralization: I. Hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurologi42, 428–459.
14.
HartmanS. E. (submitted) Factor matching using coefficient kappa.
15.
HartmanS. E.HyltonJ., & SandersR. E. (1997) The influence of hemispheric dominance on scores of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 440–449.
16.
HyltonJ., & HartmanS. E. (1997) Personality, hemispheric dominance, and cognitive style. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 28, 96–107.
17.
KneippL. B. (1991) Effects of cerebral hemisphericity on sentence/picture verification reaction times and preference for pictorial or verbal imaging strategy. (Doctoral dissertation, East Texas State Univer.)Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 04-B.
LandisJ. R., & KochG. G. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
20.
LiebermanM. G. (1986) The Hemispheric Mode Indicator technical notes. Barrington, IL: Excel, Inc.
21.
McCarthyB. (1993) Hemispheric Mode Indicator (HMI). Barrington, IL: Excel, Inc.
22.
MyersI. B., & McCaulleyM. H. (1985) A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23.
ReddonJ. R. (1995) PCA PACK: principal components analysis package. (Privately distributed)
24.
TaggartW. M.KroeckK. G., & EscoffierM. R. (1991) Validity evidence for the Myers-Briggs. Type Indicator as a measure of hemisphere dominance: another view. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 775–783.
25.
TaggartW., & TorranceE. P. (1984) Human Information Processing Survey: administrator's manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
26.
TorranceE. P., & ReynoldsC. E. (1980) Preliminary norms—technical manual for Your Style of Learning and Thinking-Form C. Athens, GA: Georgia Studies of Creative Behavior, Univer. of Georgia.
27.
WilkinsonL. (1990) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.
28.
YoungG. B., & McGloneJ. (1994) Cerebral lateralization. In JoyntR. J. (Ed.), Clinical neurology. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott. Pp. 1–97.
29.
ZenhausernR. (1978) Imagery, cerebral dominance, and style of thinking: a unified field model. Bulletin of Psychonomic Society, 2, 267–280.
