Recent findings show that children as young as 6 years of age understand some form of hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Perhaps scientific reasoning is based on complex processes that require considerable cognitive development before children can understand.
CaseR. (1974) Structures and strictures: some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 544–573.
3.
GreenboweT.HerronJ. D.LucasC.NurrenbernS.StaverJ. R., & WardC. R. (1981) Teaching preadolescents to act as scientists: replication and extension of an earlier study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 705–711.
4.
InhelderB., & PiagetJ. (1958) The growth of logical thinking: from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
5.
JorgensenJ. C., & FalmagneR. J. (1991) Aspects of the meaning of if … then for older preschoolers: hypotheticality, entailment, and suppositional processes. Cognitive Development, 7, 189–212.
6.
NiazM. (1994) Pascual-Leone's theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Educational Psychology, 14, 23–43.
7.
NiazM. (1996a) Reasoning strategies of students in solving chemistry problems as a function of developmental level, functional M-capacity and disembedding ability. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 525–541.
8.
NiazM (1996b) How students circumvent problem-solving strategies that require greater cognitive complexity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 25, 361–363.
9.
RuffmanT.PernerJ.OlsonD. R., & DohertyM. (1993) Reflecting on scientific thinking: children's understanding of the hypothesis-evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617–1636.
10.
SieglerR. S.LiebertD. E., & LiebertR. M. (1973) Inhelder and Piaget's pendulum problem: teaching preadolescents to act as scientists. Developmental Psychology, 9, 97–101.
11.
SodianB.ZaitchikD., & CareyS. (1991) Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753–766.
12.
SodhianC., & SomervilleS. C. (1988) Early developments in logical reasoning: considering alternative possibilities. Cognitive Development, 3, 183–222.
