Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A number of submaximal step tests have been developed to predict maximal aerobic capacity. Because step height may influence biomechanical efficiency and heart rate, step tests based on subjects' stature may more accurately predict maximal aerobic capacity. Eighteen women performed the Queens College step test and a modified Queens College step test. The modified step test was performed with the height of the bench set even with the height of the foot at a knee angle of 90°. Analysis of the data indicated a lower recovery heart rate following this test (p<.05). Further, correlations between maximal aerobic capacity and recovery heart rate for both tests were moderate (r = −.80 and −.75, respectively). Our results suggest that step tests based on subjects' stature do not more accurately predict aerobic capacity than those using a standardized bench height.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE. (1995) ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. (5th ed.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Ariel

(1969) The effect of knee-joint angle on Harvard step test performance. Ergonomics, 12, 33–37.

Borg

(1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 14, 377–381.

Cicutti

Jette

, & Sidney

(1991) Effect of leg length on bench stepping efficiency in children. Canadian Journal of Sports Science, 16, 58–63.

Culpepper

, & Francis

(1987) Anatomical model to determine step height in step testing for estimating aerobic capacity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 129, 1–8.

Davis

, & Wilmore

(1979) Validation of a bench stepping test for cardiorespiratory fitness classification of emergency service personnel. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 21, 671–673.

Elbel

, & Green

(1945) Pulse reaction to performing step-up exercise on benches of different heights. American Journal of Physiology, 145, 521–527.

Francis

(1987) Fitness assessment using step tests. Comparative Therapy, 13, 36–41.

Francis

, & Brasher

(1992) A height-adjusted step test for predicting maximal oxygen consumption in males. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical fitness, 32, 282–287.

10.

Francis

, & Culpepper

(1989) Height-adjusted, rate specific, single stage step test for predicting maximal oxygen consumption. Southern Medical Journal, 82, 602–606.

11.

George

Vehrs

Allen

Fellingham

, & Fisher

(1993) Development of a submaximal treadmill jogging test for fit college-aged individuals. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25, 643–647.

12.

Jackson

Pollock

, & Ward

(1980) Generalized equations for predicting body density for women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 12, 175–182.

13.

Keen

, & Sloan

(1958) Observations on the Harvard step test. Journal of Applied Physiology, 13, 241–243.

14.

McArdle

Katch

, & Katch

(1991) Exercise physiology: exercise, nutrition, and human performance. (3rd ed.) Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.

15.

McArdle

Katch

Pechar

Jacobson

, & Ruck

(1972) Reliability and interrelationships between maximal oxygen intake, physical work capacity and step test scores in college women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 4, 182–186.

16.

Shahnawaz

(1978) Influence of limb length on a stepping exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology, 44, 346–349.

17.

Shapiro

, & Magazanik

(1976) A simple test to predict aerobic capacity. Journal of Sports Medicine, 16, 209–210.

18.

Shinno

(1971) Analysis of knee function in ascending and descending stairs. Medicine and Sport. Vol. 6. Biomechanics II. Baltimore, MD: Univer. Park Press. Pp. 202–207.

19.

Tracker

, & Berkelman

(1988) Public health surveillance in the United States. Epidemiological Review, 10, 164–171.

A Modified Step Test Based on a Function of Subjects' Stature

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References