For three groups of 20 subjects each who participated reading time was examined when stories suggested goal and state inferences which could be made by readers when asked state questions, goal questions, or no questions at all. Order of inference statement was also used as a variable. In addition, inferable statements were either left in or out of the text. Subjects read an equal number (12) of stories. Analysis showed that state inference took longer time than goal inference. Also, it took longer for subjects to draw inferences when the inferrable statement was absent than when it was present in the text. The effect of inference type, and condition on reading comprehension is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransfordJ. D.BarclayJ. R., & FranksJ. J. (1972) Sentence memory: a constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
2.
BransfordJ. D., & FranksJ. J. (1972) Cognition. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 211–249.
3.
BransfordJ. D., & JohnsonM. K. (1973) Considerations of some problems of comprehension. In ChaseW. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 221–230.
4.
BransfordJ. D., & McCarrellN. S. (1975) A sketch of a cogniuve approach to comprehension. In WeimerW. & PalermoD. (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 16–39.
5.
BridgetF. A. (1993) Deductive reading with prose passages: effects of knowledge, inference form, and reading skill. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA, March 25–28.
6.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S., & LarkinK. M. (1980) Inference in text understanding. In SpiroR. J.BruceB., & BrewerW. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 55–75.
7.
GarrodS. D., & SanfordA. (1977) Interpreting anaphoric relations: the integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 77–90.
8.
GraesserA. C. (1981) Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag
9.
GraesserA. C.RobertsonP. S.LovelaceE. R., & SwinehartD. M. (1980) Answers to why-questions expose the organization of story plot and predict recall of actionsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 110–119.
10.
HarrisR. J. (1981) Inferences and comprehension. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 15. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 203–215.
11.
HavilandS. E., & ClarckH. H. (1974) What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.
12.
KemperS. (1982) Filling in the missing links. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 99–107.
13.
LabergeD. (1976) Perceptual learning and attention. In EstesW. K. (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Vol. 4. Pp. 310–320.
14.
MoravcsikJ. E., & KintschW. (1995) Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. In HendersonJ. M.SingerM., & FerreiraF. (Eds.), Reading and language comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 232–246.
15.
OlsonM. G.DuffyA. S., & MacKL. R. (1985) Question-asking as a component of text comprehension. In GraesserC. A. & BlackB. J. (Eds.), The psychology of questions. London: Taylor & Francis. Pp. 66–78.
16.
SchankR. C. (1982) Reading and understanding: teaching from the perspective of artificial intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
SchankR. C., & AbelsonR. P. (1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
SeifertC. M., & BlackJ. B. (1983) Thematic relations between episodes. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Rochester, NY.
19.
SeifertC. M.McKoonC.AbelsonR. P., & RatcliffR. (1984) Memory connections between thematically similar episodes. Tech. Rep., No 27, Yale University Cognitive Science Program.
20.
SeifertC. M.RobertsonP. S., & BlackJ. B. (1982) On-line processing of pragmatic inferences. Cognitive science technical report, Yale University Cognitive Science Program.
21.
SeifertC. M.RobertsonP. S., & BlackJ. B. (1985) Types of inferences generated during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 405–422.
22.
SingerM. (1980) The role of case-filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages. Discourse Processes, 3, 185–201.
23.
Van-DijkT. A. (1995) On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: a brief personal history of Kintsch-Van Dijk. In WeaverC. A.MnnesS., & FletcherC. R. (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 383–410.
