Real three-dimensional models and three-dimensional images were used in a test of mental rotation. Although the 33 men performed better than the 33 women when presented three-dimensional images (14.4 and 11.2), this sex difference disappeared when real models were used (17.5 and 17.3).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
2.
DurkinK. (1987) Social cognition and social context in the construction of sex differences. In BakerM. A. (Ed.), Sex differences in human performance. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Pp. 141–170.
3.
GearyD. C. (1996) Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229–284.
4.
HamiltonC. J. (1995) Beyond sex differences in visuospatial processing: the impact of gender trait possession. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 1–20.
5.
KimuraD. (1992) Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267(3), 118–125.
6.
PhilipsR. J.RawlesR. E. (1976) Three dimensional figures. London: University College.
7.
ShepardR. N.MetzlerJ. (1971) Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
8.
VoterD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
