Responsibility is related to escalation of commitment, a phenomenon in which individuals continue to invest in a failing course of action despite evidence that suggests that continued investment is unwise. Prior research indicates that individuals making multiple decisions as part of a sequential task are likely to engage in escalation behavior (Brockner, 1992). Investigators of escalation have not examined cognitive by-products of the decision-making process. In this study, the number of decisions, e.g., one or two, was used to manipulate the amount of responsibility. It was predicted that subjects making multiple decisions would remember more information supporting their initial decision than those who made only a single final decision. Analysis indicated that proportion recalled was the same for both groups. It appears that memory for the information used in the decision-making process is not related to amount of responsibility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonC. A. (1995) Implicit personality theories and empirical data: biased assimilation, belief perseverance and change, and covariation detection sensitivity. Social Cognition, 13, 25–48.
2.
AndersonN.HubertS. (1963) Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379–391.
3.
AronsonE. (1972) The social animal. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
4.
BazermanM. H.GiulianoR.AppelmanA. (1984) Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 141–152.
5.
BrocknerJ. (1992) The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39–61.
6.
BrocknerJ.RubinJ. Z. (1985) Entrapment in escalating conflicts. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
BrodyR. G.KaplanS. E. (1996) Escalation of commitment among internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15, 1–15.
8.
ChurchB. K.SchneiderA. (1992) Internal auditor involvement in internal control system design: is objectivity impaired?Journal of Applied Business Research, 8, 15–24.
9.
DellarosaD.BourneL. E. (1984) Decisions and memory: differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 669–682.
10.
FestingerL. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
11.
FyockJ.StangorC. (1994) The role of memory biases in stereotype maintenance. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 331–343.
12.
GollubH.RossmanB.AbelsonR. (1973) Social inference as a function of the number of instances and consistency of information presented. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 19–33.
13.
HastieR.KumarP. A. (1979) Person memory: personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25–38.
14.
HastieR.ParkB. (1986) The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268.
15.
Heiman-HoffmanV. B.MoserD. V.JosephJ. A. (1995) The impact of an auditor's initial hypothesis on subsequent performance at identifying actual errors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 763–779.
16.
KoriatA.LichtensteinS.FischhoffB. (1980) Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.
17.
LingleJ. H.OstromT. M. (1979) Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 180–194.
18.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
19.
McCarthyA. M.SchoormanF. D.CooperA. C. (1993) Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: rational decision-making or escalation of commitment?Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 9–24.
20.
MoserD. V. (1992) Does memory affect judgment? Self-generated versus recall memory measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 555–563.
21.
MurdockB. B.Jr. (1962) The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482–488.
22.
SchaubroeckJ.DavisE. (1994) Prospect theory predictions when escalation is not the only chance to recover sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 59–82.
23.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1989) Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58–83.
24.
StawB. M. (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27–44.
25.
StawB. M. (1981) The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577–587.
26.
StawB. M.RossJ. (1987) Behavior in escalation situations: antecedents, prototypes and solutions. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 39–78.
27.
SternL. D.MarrsS.MillarM. G.ColeE. (1984) Processing time and the recall of inconsistent and consistent behaviors of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 253–262.
28.
WasonP. C.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1972) Psychology of reasoning: structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
29.
WhyteG. (1991) Diffusion of responsibility: effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 408–415.
30.
WoehrD. J.FeldmanJ. (1993) Processing objective and question order effects on the causal relation between memory and judgment in performance appraisal: the tip of the iceberg. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 232–241.
31.
WyerR. S.SrullT. K.GordonS. E.HartwickJ. (1982) The effects of taking a perspective on the recall of prose material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 674–688.
