Experienced (n = 14) and inexperienced (n = 12) tennis players were tested for response to a tennis ball hit to either the right, left, or directly at them under two auditory conditions. In one condition, subjects heard the impact of the ball against the racquet strings. In the other condition, subjects wore sound protectors that completely eliminated the auditory signal. In the latter condition reaction time was slowed when the ball was hit directly at the subject. Experienced and inexperienced tennis players were equally affected, indicating prior interdependence of audition and vision in tennis. No difference in response time was observed for groups of differing experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernsteinI. H.ClarkM. H.EdelsteinB. A. (1969) Effects of an auditory signal on visual reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 567–569.
2.
BernsteinI. H.EdelsteinB. A. (1971) Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 241–247.
3.
GouletC.BardC.FleuryM. (1989) Expertise differences in preparing to return a tennis serve: a visual information processing approach. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 382–398.
4.
McLeodP. (1987) Visual reaction time and high speed ball games. Perception, 16, 49–59.
5.
NickersonR. S. (1974) Intersensory facilitation of reaction times. Psychological Review, 80, 489–509.
6.
RipollH.FleuranceP. (1988) What does keeping one's eye on the ball mean?Ergonomics, 31, 1647–1654.
7.
SchmidtR. A.GielenC. C. A. M.van den HeuvelP. J. M. (1983) The locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 57, 145–164.
8.
TaylorR. L.CampbellG. T. (1976) Sensory interaction: vision is modulated by hearing. Perception, 5, 467–477.
