The magnitude of the Ebbinghaus illusion has been reported to be greater when test element and context elements are figurally similar as opposed to figurally dissimilar. In the current investigation with 16 observers, illusion magnitude was greater for a figurally similar configuration even though the context elements of the figurally similar configuration were perceived as smaller than the context elements of a figurally dissimilar configuration. Hence, figural similarity appears to have a prepotent effect in the Ebbinghaus illusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoringE. G.Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1942.
2.
CorenS.A size illusion without physical size differences. American Journal of Psychology, 1971, 84, 565–566.
3.
CorenS.EnnsJ. T.Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers. Perception and Psychophysics, 1993, 54, 579–588.
4.
CorenS.GirgusJ. S.Illusion decrement in intersecting line figures. Psychonomic Society Bulletin, 1972, 26, 108–110.
5.
CorenS.MillerJ.Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 16355–357.
6.
SchumannF.Beitrage zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1900, 23, 1–32. (ns).
