Picture and word recall was examined in conjunction with list organization. 60 subjects studied a list of 30 items, either words or their pictorial equivalents. The 30 words/pictures, members of five conceptual categories, each represented by six exemplars, were presented either blocked by category or in a random order. While pictures were recalled better than words and a standard blocked-random effect was observed, the interaction indicated that the recall advantage of a blocked presentation was restricted to the word lists. A similar pattern emerged for clustering. These findings are discussed in terms of limitations upon the pictorial superiority effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BattigW. F.MontagueW. E. (1969) Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories a replication and extension of the Connecticut norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Mongraphs, 80(3, Pt. 2).
2.
CoferC. N.BruceD. R.ReicherG. M. (1966) Clustering in free recall as a function of certain methodological variations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 858–866.
3.
D'AgostinoP. R. (1969) The blocked-random effect in recall and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 815–820.
4.
GehringR. E.TogliaM. P.KimbleG. A. (1976) Recognition for words and pictures at short and long retention intervalsMemory and Cognition, 4, 256–260.
5.
GollinE. S.SharpsM. J. (1988) Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type. Memory & Cognition, 16, 539–544.
6.
HortonD. L.MillsC. B. (1984) Human learning and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 361–394.
7.
KintschW. (1968) Recognition and free recall of organized lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 481–487.
8.
NelsonD. L.ReedV. S.McEvoyC. L. (1977) Learning to order pictures and words: a model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 485–497.
9.
PaivioA. (1971) Imagery and verbal process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
10.
RoenkerD. L.ThompsonC. P.BrownS. C. (1971) Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.
11.
SnodgrassJ. G.VanderwartM. (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 174–215.
