We report test-retest reliabilities for a battery of tests (vision, hearing, vibration sense, proprioception, forced expiratory volume, blood pressure, grip strength, and sway) shown previously to predict functional age. Fifty women aged 60 to 86 were retested on the battery after 3 months. All tests except proprioception and blood pressure had reliabilities between .70 and .94. We conclude that the battery provides reliable measures of sensory, motor, and physiological variables which may be used as markers of biological aging in psychological research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsteyK. J.LordS. R.SmithG. (1996) Measuring human functional age: a review of empirical findings. Experimental Aging Research, 22, 245–266.
2.
AnsteyK. J.SmithG. A. (1996) Biomarkers of aging as predictors of age-related variance in cognition. Poster session presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
3.
AnsteyK. J.StankovL.LordS. R. (1993) Primary aging, secondary aging and intelligence. Psychology and Aging, 8, 562–570.
4.
De DomenicoG.McCloskyD. I. (1987) Accuracy of voluntary movements at the thumb and elbow joints. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 471–478.
5.
LetourneauJ. E.GirouxR. (1988) Reliability and validity of the dot visual acuity test. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 59, 131–134.
6.
LordS. R.ClarkR. D.WebsterI. W. (1991) Postural stability and associated physiological factors in a population of aged persons. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 46, M69–M76
7.
RosnerB.PolkF. (1979) The implications of blood pressure variability for clinical and screening purposes. Journal of Chronic Disease, 32, 451–461.
