30 adults received two learning trials on which they viewed computer images of urban scenes followed by a recognition test to assess the effect of visual detail on scene recognition. The scenes were shown in either high detail (photographic) or reduced detail. Analysis showed no main effect of detail on scene recognition; however, analysis of the interaction for sex X detail indicated that women recognized significantly more scenes in the photographic condition than in the two with reduced detail. Men showed no differences. The unexpected sex differences suggest the relevance of subjects' strategies during visual processing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeltranS. F.DuqueY. (1993) Processing typical objects in scenes: Effects of photographs versus line drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 307–312.
2.
BruceP. R.HermanJ. F. (1986) Adult age differences in spatial memory: Effects of distinctiveness and repeated experience. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 774–777.
3.
CaplanP. J.MacphersonG. M.TobinP. (1985) Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist?American Psychologist, 40, 786–799.
GaleaL. A.KimuraD. (1993) Sex differences in route learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53–65.
6.
GoldinS. E.ThorndykeP. W. (1982) Simulating navigation for spatial knowledge acquisition. Human Factors, 24, 457–471.
7.
HamelC. J.ClarkS. L. (1986) CAI evaluation checklist: Human factors guidelines for the design of computer-aided instruction. (Technical Report NTSC TR86-002), Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
8.
KailR. V.SiegelA. W. (1978) Sex and hemispheric differences in the recall of verbal and spatial information. Cortex, 14, 557–563.
9.
KirasicK. C. (1991) Spatial cognition and behavior in young and elderly adults: Implications for learning new environments. Psychology and Aging, 6, 10–18.
10.
LipmanP. D. (1991) Age and exposure differences in acquisition of route information. Psychology and Aging, 6, 128–133.
11.
LoftusG. R.NelsonW. W.KallmanH. J. (1983) Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 187–198.
12.
McGuinnessD.SparksJ. (1983) Cognitive style and cognitive maps: Sex differences in representations of a familiar terrain. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 91–100.
13.
NelsonT. O.MetzlerJ.ReedD. A. (1974) Role of details in the long-term recognition of pictures and verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 184–186.
14.
Neuroscan, Inc. (1991) STIM. Herndon, VA: Author.
15.
SchwartzN. H.PhillippeA. E. (1991) Individual differences in the retention of maps. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 171–182.
16.
SharpsM. J.GollinE. S. (1987) Memory for object locations in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 336–341.
17.
SiegelA. (1981) The externalization of cognitive maps by children and adults: In search of ways to ask better questions. In LibenL.PattersonA.NewcombeN. (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the lifespan. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 167–194.
18.
WetzelC. D.RadtkeP. H.SternH. W. (1994) Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
