44 students judged two types of ungrammatical sentences, Kuno's and Chomsky's, for their grammaticality, meaningfulness, and ordinariness. Whether judgments of grammaticality were predicted by the remaining two judgments was explored. Analysis showed that judged grammaticality of Kuno's items was predicted significantly by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness while that of Chomsky's items was predicted only by judged meaningfulness. This indicates that the relative contribution by judged meaningfulness and ordinariness toward predicting judged grammaticality depends on the type of ungrammaticality of the sentences judged.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BardE. G.RobertsonD.SoraceA. (1996) Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72, 32–68.
2.
BeverT. G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In HayesJ. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley. Pp. 279–362.
3.
ChomskyN. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
CowartW. (in press) Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
DanksJ. H.GlucksbergS. (1970) Psychological scaling of linguistic properties. Language and Speech, 13, 118–140.
LeveltW. J. M. (1974) Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Volume III. Psychological applications. The Hague: Mouton.
10.
MaclayH.SleatorM. D. (1961) Responses to language: Judgments of grammaticality. International Journal of American Linguistics, 26, 275–283.
11.
NagataH. (1987) Long-term effect of repetition on judgments of grammaticality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 295–299.
12.
NagataH. (1990) Speaker's sensitivity to rule violations in sentences. Psychologia, 33, 179–184.
13.
SchützeC. T. (1996) The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press
14.
VetterH. J.VoloveckyJ.HowellR. W. (1979) Judgments of grammaticalness: A partial replication and extension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 567–583.
