The aim was to identify changes in communication skills and behaviour disorder of 15 clients with learning difficulties 6 mo. and 1 yr. after they moved from large- to small-scale accommodations. Clients were allocated into a group of 6 with profound multiple learning difficulties, a preverbal group of 5, and a verbal group of 4. Communication skills were measured using the Preverbal Communication Schedule, and behavioural disorder was measured using the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist. Analysis showed that from the baseline to one year follow-up, there was a significant increase from baseline in social withdrawal by the clients with multiple difficulties but that there were improvements in communication skills of both preverbal and verbal clients. No control group was involved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmanM. G.SinghN. N.StewartA. W.FieldC. J. (1985) The Aberrant Behavioral Checklist: a behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485–491.
2.
ChamberlainL.ChungM. C.JennerL. (1993) Preliminary findings on communication and challenging behaviour in learning difficulty. The British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, XXXIX, 118–125.
3.
ConneallyS.BoyleG.SmythF. (1992) An evaluation of the use of small group homes for adults with a severe and profound mental handicap. Mental Handicap Research, 5, 146–168.
4.
DurandV. M.CrimminsD. B. (1988) Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–115.
5.
EmersonE.BeasleyF.OffordG.MansellJ. (1992) An evaluation of hospital-based specialized staffed housing for people with seriously challenging behaviors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 36, 291–307.
6.
FelceD.LoweK.PaivaS. D. (1994) Ordinary housing for people with severe learning disabilities and challenging behaviours In EmersonÉMcGillP.MansellJ.(Eds.), Severe learning disabilities and challenging behaviour: designing quality services. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. 97–118.
7.
FelceD.ReppA. C.ThomasM.AgerA.BlundenR. (1991) The relationship of staff:client ratios, interactions and residential placement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 315–331.
8.
GrossmanH. J. (Ed.) (1983) Classification in mental retardation. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
9.
HarrisP.RussellO. (1992) How to meet a challenge. Health Services Journal, 8(10), 28–29.
10.
HemmingH.LavenderT.PillR. (1981) Quality of life of mentally deficient adults transferred from large institutions to new small units. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 157–169.
11.
HoefkensA.AllenD. (1990) Evaluation of a special behavior unit for people with mental handicaps and challenging behavior. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 34, 213–228.
12.
KiernanC.ReidB. (1987) Preverbal Communication Schedule. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
13.
LakinK. C.BruininksR. H.ChenT. H.HillB. K.AndersonD. (1993) Personal characteristics and competence of people with mental retardation living in foster homes and small group homes. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 616–627.
14.
LoweK.PaivaD.FelceD. (1993) Effects of a community-based service on adaptive and maladaptive behaviours: a longitudinal study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 37, 3–22.
15.
MurphyG.HollandA.FowlerP.ReepJ. (1991) MIETS: a service option for people with mild mental handicaps and challenging behaviour or psychiatric problems: I. Philosophy, service and service users. Mental Handicap Research, 4, 41–66.
16.
OrlowskaD.McGillP.MansellJ. (1991) Staff-staff and staff-resident verbal interactions in a community-based group home for people with moderate and severe mental handicaps. Mental Handicap Research, 4, 3–19.
17.
PrattM. W.BumsteadD. C.RaynesN. V. (1976) Attendant staff speech to the institutionalized retarded: language use as a measure of the quality of care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 133–143.
