This study examined the factor structure of the six subtests of the Intermediate Category Test in a heterogeneous sample of school-referred students, age 9 to 14 years. A three-factor solution emerged that accounted for approximately 72% of the total variance. This indicates that the test measures multiple underlying constructs in this school-referred sample. Clinical and educational interpretations may be enhanced by utilizing factor scores that reflect the multiple abilities assessed. Recommendations for developing factor/index scores are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DondersJ.StromD. (1995) Factor and cluster analysis of the Intermediate Halstead Category Test. Child Neuropsychology, 1, 19–25.
2.
FischerW. E.DeanR. S. (1990) Factor structure of the Halstead Category Test by age and gender. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 180–183.
3.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995) Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
4.
HoltzJ. L.GearhartL. P.WatsonC. G. (1996) Comparability of scores on projector-and booklet-administered forms of the Category Test in brain-impaired veterans and controls. Neuropsychology, 10, 194–196.
5.
KellyM. D.KundertD. K.DeanR. S. (1992) Factor analysis and matrix invariance of the HRNB-C Category Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 7, 415–418.
6.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1992) Neuropsychological evaluation of older children. South Tucson, AR: Neuropsychology Press.
7.
ReynoldsC. R.BiglerE. D. (1996) Factor structure, factor indexes, and other useful statistics for interpretation of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 29–44.
8.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996) Using multivariate statistics. (3rd ed.) New York: HarperCollins.
