To make the Digit Symbol subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–III more useful in neuropsychological assessment, the measurement and influence of motor speed and incidental learning on subjects' performance was examined. Analysis indicated that motor speed but not incidental learning were significant influences on scores. Statistically significant differences between 150 males (M age 12.3 yr., SD = 2.8) and 150 females (M age 12.1 yr., SD = 2.7) were obtained for both raw and scaled scores on the Digit Symbol subtest. The implications of these gender differences are discussed as a possible example of differences in executive function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarkleyR. A. (1990) Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.
2.
BornM. P. H.LynnR. (1994) Sex differences on the Dutch WISC–R: a comparison with the USA and Scotland. Educational Psychology, 14, 249–254.
3.
BorysS. V.SpitzH. H.DoransB. A. (1982) Tower of Hanoi performance of retarded young adults and nonretarded children as a function of solution length and goal state. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 87–110.
4.
HexumC. L.HautJ. S.HautM. W. (1994) Modification of the WISC–III Coding B subtest for neuropsychological assessment. Paper presented at the 22nd annual meeting of the International Neuropsychology Society, February, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
5.
JensenA. R.ReynoldsC. R. (1983) Sex differences on the WISC–R. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 223–226.
6.
KaufmannA. (1975) Factor analysis of the WISC–R at 11 age levels between 6½ and 16½ years. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 135–147.
7.
KellyM. S.BestC. T.KirkU. (1989) Cognitive processing deficits in reading disabilities: a prefrontal cortical hypothesis. Brain and Cognition, 11, 275–293.
8.
LevinH. S.CulhaneK. A.HartmannJ.EvankovichK.MattsonA. J.HarwardH.RingholzG.Ewing-CobbsL.FletcherJ. M. (1991) Developmental changes in performance on tests of purported frontal lobe functioning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 1, 349–370.
9.
LyleJ. F.JohnsonE. G. (1974) Analysis of WISC coding: prediction of coding performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 111–114.
10.
LynnR.MulhernG. (1991) A comparison of sex differences on the Scottish and American standardisation samples of the WISC–R. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1179–1182.
11.
McHughM. C.KoeskeR. D.FriezeI. H. (1986) Issue to consider in conducting non-sexist psychological research: a guide for researchers. American Psychologist, 41, 879–890.
12.
MirskyA. F.AnthonyB. J.DuncanC. C.AhearnM. B.KellamS. G. (1991) Analysis of the elements of attention: a neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review, 2, 109–145.
13.
MoffitT. E. (1993) The neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 135–151.
14.
SattlerJ. M. (1988) The assessment of children's intelligence. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
15.
ShalliceT. (1992) Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 298, 198–209.
16.
ShawD. J. (1965) Sexual bias in the WAIS. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 590–591.
17.
WarrickP. D.NaglieriJ. A. (1993) Gender differences in planning, attention, simultaneous and successive (PASS) cognitive processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 693–701.
18.
WechslerD. (1958) The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. (4th ed.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
19.
WechslerD. (1991) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–III. Sidcup: Psychological Corp.
