New empirical evidence and statistical derivations of Benford's Law have led to successful goodness-of-fit tests to detect fraud in accounting data. Several recent case studies support the hypothesis that fabricated data do not conform to expected true digital frequencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshcraftM. (1992) Cognitive arithmetic: a review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75–106.
2.
BakanP. (1960) Response-tendencies in attempts to generate binary series. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 127–131.
3.
BenfordF. (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 78, 551–572.
4.
BertonR. F. (1995) He's got their number: scholar uses math to foil financial fraud. Wall Street Journal, July 10, 1995.
5.
ChapanisA. (1953) Random-number guessing behavior. American Psychologist, 8, 332.
6.
DehaeneS.MehlerJ. (1992) Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 43, 1–29.
7.
HillT. P. (1988) Random-number guessing and the first-digit phenomenon. Psychological Reports, 62. 967–971.
8.
HillT. P. (1995a) Base-invariance implies Benford's Law. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 123, 887–895.
9.
HillT. P. (1995b) The significant-digit phenomenon. American Mathematical Monthly, 102, 322–327.
10.
HillT. P. (1996) A statistical derivation of the significant-digit law. Statistical Science, 10, 354–363.
11.
NeuringerA. (1986) Can people behave “randomly”?: the role of feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology (General), 115, 62–75.
12.
NewcombS. (1881) Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 39–40.
13.
NigriniM. J. (1994a) Evidence of taxpayer manipulation from unaudited tax data. Preprint, Department of Accounting, St. Mary's University.
14.
NigriniM. J. (1994b) Using digital frequencies to detect fraud. Preprint, Department of Accounting, St. Mary's University.
15.
NigriniM. J. (1996) A taxpayer compliance application of Benford's Law. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 18, 72–91.
16.
RaimiR. A. (1969) The peculiar distribution of first significant digits. Scientific American, 221(6), 109–120.
