This study examined the syntactic abilities of neurologically normal and suspect preterm children at preschool age to characterize their language skills and to assess specific differences between groups. The Index of Productive Syntax was used to score language transcripts. The children exhibited reduced syntactic performance, particularly in the use of questions, negatives, and complex sentence structure. Children considered to be neurologically suspect had more difficulty with development of verb phrases than did neurologically normal children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AramD. M.HackM.HawkinsS.WeissmanB.Borawski-ClarkE. (1992) Very low birthweight children and speech and language development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1169–1179.
2.
CraigH. K.EvansI. L.MeiselsS. J.PlunkettJ. W. (1991) Linguistic production abilities of 3-year-old children born premature with low birth weight. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 326–337.
3.
CrystalD. (1992) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4.
GorgaD.SternF. M.RossG.NaglerW. (1991) The neuromotor behavior of preterm and full-term children by three years of age: quality of movement and variability. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 12, 102–107.
5.
HardyJ. B.DrageJ. S.JacksonE. (1979) First year of life: the collaborative perinatal project of the National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univer. Press.
6.
HoldgraterG. (1995) Language abilities of neurologically normal and suspect preterm children now in preschoolPerceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 1251–1262.
7.
LaheyM. (1988) Language disorders and language development. New York, NY: Macmillan.
8.
LewisM.BenderskyM. (1989) Cognitive and motor differences among low birth weight infants: impact of intraventricular hemorrhage, medical risk, and social class. Pediatrics, 83, 187–192.
9.
LongS. H.FeyM. E. (1993) Computerized profiling. Toronto, ON: Psychological Corporation.
10.
MillerJ. F. (1993) SALT: Systematic analysis of language transcripts. Madison, WI: Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center, Univer. of Wisconsin-Madison.
11.
PiperM. C.ByrneP. J.PinnellL. E. (1989) Influence of gestational age on early neuromotor development in the preterm infant. American Journal of Perinatology, 4, 405–411.
12.
RescorlaL.SchwartzE. (1988) Outcome of specific expressive language delay. Paper presented to the International Conference on Infant Studies, Washington, DC.
13.
RossG.LipperG.AuldP. (1991) Education status and school-related abilities of very low birth weight premature children. Pediatrics, 88, 1125–1134.
14.
ScarboroughH. (1990) Index of Productive Syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.
15.
ScarboroughH.DobrichW. (1985) Illusory recovery from early language delay. Proceedings of the Wisconsin Symposium of Research in Child Language Disorders, 6, 90–99.
16.
WatkinsR. V. (1994) Grammatical challenges for children with specific language impairments. In WatkinsR. V.RiceM. L.(Eds.), Specific language impairments in children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Pp. 53–69.
