Testing of a probabilistic model for the analysis of the Reflective-Impulsive cognitive styles was carried out on 178 school-age children. The model allows the sample be split into two groups of Cognitive Responders and Random Responders. Comparisons were made between groups at three age levels (8-yr., 10-yr., and 12-yr.-olds). Analysis indicated that Cognitive Responders scored better than Random Responders on a variety of measures, and group differences were related to children's developmental status. These results replicate and extend previous research with this model. Implications of random responses for research on reflection-impulsivity and the distinction between cognitive styles and cognitive development are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AncillottiJ. P. (1985) Dimension réflexive-impulsive de la personalité et fonctionnement cognitif. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 667–686.
2.
AultR. L.MitchellC.HartmannD. P. (1976) Some methodological problems in reflection-impulsivity research. Child Development, 47, 227–231.
3.
BentonA. L. (1974) Revised Visual Retention Test, clinical and experimental applications. New York: Psychological Corp.
4.
BlockJ. (1987) Misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test: premature or overdue?Developmental Psychology, 23, 740–741.
5.
BlockJ.BlockJ. H.HarringtonD. M. (1974) Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 10, 611–632.
6.
CohenJ. J.FishM. C. (1993) Handbook of school-based interventions: resolving students problems and promoting healthy educational environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
CzeschlikT. (1993) General intelligence, temperament, and the Matching Familiar Figures Test. European Journal of Personality, 7, 379–386.
8.
DoobL. W. (1990) Hesitation, impulsivity, and reflection. New York: Greenwood.
9.
EgelandB.WeinbergR. A. (1976) The Matching Familiar Figures Test: a look at its psychometric credibility. Child Development, 47, 483–491.
10.
GargalloB. (1993) Basic variables in reflection-impulsivity: a training programme to increase reflectivity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 151–167.
11.
GjerdeF.BlockJ.BlockH. (1985) Longitudinal consistency of Matching Familiar Figures Test from early childhood to preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 21, 262–271.
12.
GlobersonT. (1989) What is the relationship between cognitive style and cognitive development? In GlobersonT.ZelnikerT.(Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
GómezP. M.PadillaR.RollS. (1984) Escala de lnteligencia para Nivel Escolar-Wechster (WISC–RM)[Wechsler Intelligence Scale for School Level]. México City: El Manual Moderno.
14.
HashwayR. M.DukeL. I. (1992) Cognitive styles: a primer to the literature. New York: Edwin Mellen.
15.
JonassenD. H.GrabowskiB. L. (1993) Handbook of individual differences: learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
KaganJ. (1965) Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 154–160.
17.
KaganJ. (1966) Reflection-impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17–24.
18.
KaganJ. (1971) Understanding children: behavior, motives and thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
19.
KaganJ.LapidusD. R.MooreM. (1978) Infant antecedents of cognitive functioning: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 49, 1005–1023.
20.
KaganJ.MesserS. B. (1975) A reply to “Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity.”Developmental Psychology, 11, 244–248.
21.
KaganJ.RossmanB. L.DayD.AlbertJ.PhillipsW. (1964) Information processing in the child: significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78, No. 1 (Whole No. 578).
22.
KoganN.SaarniC. (1990) Cognitive styles in children: some evolving trends. In SarachoO. N.(Ed.), Cognitive style and early education. New York: Gordon and Breach Science. Pp. 3–31.
23.
MeadowsS. (1993) The child as thinker: the development and acquisition of cognition in childhood. London: Routledge.
24.
MesserS. B. (1976) Reflection-impulsivity: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.
25.
SalkindN. J. (1978) The development of norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test. (Unpublished manuscript, Univer. of Kansas).
26.
SalkindN. J.WrightJ. C. (1977) The development of reflection-impulsivity and cognitive efficiency: an integrated model. Human Development, 20, 377–387.
27.
SchacharR.LoganG. D. (1990) Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26, 710–720.
28.
SchaeferC. E.MillmanH. L. (1980) Therapies for children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Solís-CámaraR. P.DíazM.Solís-CámaraV. P. (1990) Consistencia del tiempo conceptual en sujetos rápidos (impulsivos) o lentos (reflexivos) entre los 10 y los 12 años de edad [Conceptual tempo consistency in fast (impulsive) or slow (reflective) subjects between 10 and 12 years of age]. Revista Intercontinental de Psicología y Educación, 3, 115–130.
30.
Solís-CámaraR. P.Solís-CámaraV. P. (1987a) Efectos a largo plazo (30 meses) en la modificación de la impulsividad: su relevancia para la comprensión de los estílos [Long-term (30 months) effects of modifying impulsivity: their relevance to an understanding of style]. Interamerican Journal of Psychology/Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 21, 41–55.
31.
Solís-CámaraR. P.Solís-CámaraV. P. (1987b) Is the Matching Familiar Figures Test a measure of cognitive style? A warning for users. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 59–74.
32.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J. S.HoulbergK.HallM. (1994) When is “impulsiveness” not impulsive? The case of hyperactive children's cognitive style. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1247–1253.
33.
Van MerriënboerJ. J. G.JelsmaO.TimmermansJ.SikkenJ. (1989) Computerized vs experimenter-controlled administration of the Matching Familiar Figures Test: mean test scores and reliabilities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 883–891.
34.
Van den BroekM. D.BradshawC. M. (1993) An investigation of the relationships between perseveration and impulsiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 531–534.
35.
WagnerI. (1988) Attention training with individuals, groups and classes. School Psychology International, 9, 277–283.
36.
WallbrownF. H.WirthE.EnginA. W. (1975) Some evidence relevant to Kagan's comments on the clinical interpretation of the Bender-Gestalt. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 345–347.
37.
WechslerD. (1974) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.
38.
WilliamsM.LaheyB. B. (1977) The functional independence of response latency and accuracy: implications for the concept of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 371–378.
