An analysis was carried out of influence of self-monitoring on perception of performance norms, the attitudes shared among team members about how high a performance the group should achieve. High self-monitoring individuals have a higher mean perception of performance norms, whereas the low self-monitoring individuals have lower mean perception of norms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient α and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–335.
2.
GangestedS.SnyderM. (1985) To crave nature at its joints: On the existence of discrete classes in personality. Psychological Review, 92, 317–349.
3.
LandersD. M.AjzenI. (1981) Group performance: Interaction and leadership. In LüschenG. R. F.SageG. H.(Ed.), Handbook of social science of sport. Chicago, IL: Stipes. P. 297.
4.
MisumiJ. (1985) The behavior science of leadership. Ann Arbor, MI: Univer. of Michigan Press.
5.
SnyderM. (1974) The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.
6.
SnyderM. (1979) Self-monitoring processes. InBerkowitzL.(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press. P. 89.
7.
SnyderM.MonsonT. C. (1975) Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 637–644.
