To compare mental versus integrated models explanations of syllogistic reasoning, we administered a multiple-choice questionnaire containing 19 pairs of syllogistic premises with valid conclusions (given in a C-A order) to 72 psychology undergraduates. Association between our integrated models classification and the empirical difficulty of items was strong.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaraB.BucciarelliM.Johnson-LairdP. N. (1995) Development of Syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 157–191.
2.
FordM. (1995) Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 54, 1–71.
3.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1983) Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.