This study examined cancer survey return rates in relation to race-specific versus general stamps used on self-addressed stamped return envelopes. Of the 104 race-specific stamps sent 41 (39%) were returned. Of the 108 general stamps sent 41 (38%) were returned. Thus, race-specific stamps were not effective in increasing return rates in this sample of African-American women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongJ. S.LuskE. J. (1987) Return postage in mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 233–248.
2.
BrookL. L. (1978) The effect of different postage combinations on response levels and speed of reply. Journal of the Market Research Society, 20, 238–244.
3.
ChoiB. K.PakA. W.PurdhamJ. T. (1990) Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nursesEpidemiology, 1, 72–74.
4.
GullahornJ. E.GullahornJ. T. (1963) An investigation of the effects of three factors on response to mail questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 294–296.
5.
HarrisJ. R.GuffeyH. J. (1978) Questionnaire returns: Stamps versus business reply envelopes revisited. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 290–293.
6.
JonesW. H.LindaG. (1978) Multiple criteria effects in a mail survey experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 280–284.
7.
KimballA. E. (1961) Increasing the rate of return in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing, 25, 63–64.
8.
McCrohanK. F.LoweL. S. (1981) A cost/benefit approach to postage used on mail questionnaires. Journal of Marketing, 45, 130–133.
9.
PetersonR. A. (1975) An experimental investigation of mail-survey responses. Journal of Business Research, 3, 199–209.
10.
WatsonJ. J. (1965) Improving the response rate in mail research. Journal of Advertising Research, 5, 48–50.
11.
WisemanF. (1973) Factor interaction effects in mail survey response rates. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 330–333.
