Simple motor reaction time and judgment of temporal order are commonly recognized as two methods for estimation of perceptual latency. Unfortunately, the results obtained by the methods under the same conditions do not agree. We review hypotheses attempting to explain the disagreement. Although some of these seem to be promising, no one at present could be fully accepted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanL. G. (1975a) The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 29–36.
2.
AllanL. G. (1975b) Temporal order psychometric functions based on confidence-rating data. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 369–372.
3.
AllanL. G.KristoffersonA. B. (1974) Successive discrimination: Two models. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 37–46.
4.
AlpernM. (1954) The relation of visual latency to intensity. A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology, 142, 258–267.
5.
AngelA. (1973) Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 193–200.
6.
BarrM. (1983) A comparison of reaction-time and temporal-order judgment estimates of latency to sinusoidal gratings. Perception, 12, A7. (Abstract)
7.
BartlettN. R.MacLeodS. (1954) Effect of flash and field luminance upon human reaction time. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 44, 306–311.
8.
BertelsonP.TisseyereF. (1969) The time-course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals. Acta Psychologica, 30, 145–154.
9.
BowenR. W. (1981) Latencies for chromatic and achromatic visual mechanisms. Vision Research, 21, 1457–1466.
10.
BraunerJ. D.LitA. (1976) The Pulfrich effect, simple reaction time, and intensity discrimination. American Journal of Psychology. 89105–114.
11.
BreitmeyerB. G. (1975) Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal properties of transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 15, 1411–1412.
CairneyP. T. (1975) Bisensory order judgment and the prior entry hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 39, 320–340.
14.
ChocholleR. (1940–1941) Variation de temps de reaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité á diverses frequences. L'Année Psychologique, 41/42, 65–124.
15.
ColavitaF. B. (1974) Human sensory dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 409–412.
16.
CollyerC. E. (1976) The induced asynchrony effect: Its role in visual judgment of temporal order and its relation to other dynamic perceptual phenomena. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 47–54.
17.
ColtheartM. (1980) The persistence of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 209, 57–69.
18.
DidnerR.SperlingG. (1980) Perceptual delay: A consequence of metacontrast and apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 6, 235–243.
19.
DiLlloV. (1984) On the relationship between stimulus intensity and duration of visible persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 144–151.
20.
DrewF. (1896) Attention: Experimental and critical. American Journal of Psychology, 7, 533–572.
21.
EriksenC. W.CollinsJ. F. (1969) Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 254–261.
22.
EriksenC. W.YehY. (1985) Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583–597.
23.
EschweilerG.PoppM.RauscheckerJ. P.SchraderW. (1984) Timing of flash responses in visual cortex of normal and strabismic cats. Society of Neuroscience Abstracts, 10, 469. (Abstract)
24.
EssockE. A. (1982) Anisotropics of perceived contrast and detection speed. Vision Research, 22, 1185–1191.
25.
ExnerS. (1868) Über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nöthige Zeit. Sitzungsberichte der kaiserlicher Akademie der Wissenschaften, 57, 601–632.
26.
ExnerS. (1875) Experimentalle Untersuchung der einfachsten psychischen Prozesse: III. Abhandlung, Der persönlichen Gleichung zweiter Teil. Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie der Menschen und der Thiere, 11, 403–432.
27.
FourtesM. O. F.HodgkinA. L. (1964) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus. Journal of Physiology, 172, 239–263.
28.
GibsonJ. J. (1933) Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1–31.
29.
CirayM. (1990) Über die Aktivierung der menschlichen Motorik: Theoretische und experimentelle Analysen bei Reaktionsaufgaben. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.
30.
GishK.ShulmanG. L.SheehyJ. B.LeibowitzH. W. (1986) Reaction times to different spatial frequencies as a function of detectability. Vision Research, 26, 745–747.
31.
HamplinA. J. (1895) On the least observable interval between stimuli addressed to disparate senses and to different organs. American Journal of Psychology, 6, 564–573.
32.
HansteenR. W. (1971) Visual latency as a function of stimulus onset, offset and background luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 61, 1190–1195.
33.
HawkinsH. L.ShulmanG. L. (1979) Two definitions of persistence in visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 348–350.
34.
HirshI. J.FraisseP. (1964) Simukaneite et succession de stimuli heterogenes. Annee Psychologique, 64, 1–19.
35.
HirshI. J.SherrickC. E. (1961) Perceived order in different sense modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 423–432.
36.
HolmesJ. L. (1926) Reaction time to a photometrically equal chromatic stimuli. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 414–417.
37.
HughesH. C. (1984) Effects of flash luminance and positional expectancies on visual response latencyPerception & Psychophysics, 36, 177–184.
38.
JaśkowskiP. (1985) The effect of visual adaptation on simple motor reaction time: Part I. Studio Psychologica, 27, 191–201.
39.
JaśkowskiP. (1991a) Perceived onset simultaneity of stimuli with unequal durations. Perception, 20, 715–726.
40.
JaśkowskiP. (1991b) Two-stage model for order discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 76–82.
41.
JaśkowskiP. (1992) Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli. Psychological Research, 54, 141–145.
42.
JaśkowskiP. (1993a) Selective attention and temporal order judgment. Perception, 22, 681–689.
43.
JaśkowskiP. (1993b) Temporal order judgment and reaction time to stimuli of different rise times. Perception, 22, 963–970.
44.
JaśkowskiP.JaroszykF.Hojan-JezierskaD. (1990) Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities. Psychological Research, 52, 35–38.
45.
JaśkowskiP.PruszewiczA.ŚwidzińskiP. (1990) VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction time distribution. Psychological Research, 52, 28–34.
46.
JaśkowskiP.RybarczykK.JaroszykF. (1994) On the relationship between latency of auditory evoked potentials, simple reaction time and stimulus intensity. Psychological Research, 56, 59–65.
47.
JaśkowskiP.RybarczykK.JaroszykF.LemańskiD. (1995) The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 55, 57–64.
48.
JaśkowskiP.VerlegerR. (1993) A clock-paradigm to study the relationship between expectancy and response force. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 163–174.
49.
JaśkowskiP.VerlegerR.WascherE. (1994) Response force and reaction time in a simple reaction task under time pressure. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 202, 405–413.
50.
JaśkowskiP.WróblewskiM.Hojan-JezierskaD. (1994) Impending electrical shock can affect response force in a simple reaction task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 995–1002.
51.
JohnsonT. L.ShapiroK. L. (1989) Attention to auditory and peripheral visual stimuli: Effects of arousal and predictability. Acta Psychologica, 72, 233–245.
52.
LevickW. R. (1973) Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research, 13, 837–853.
53.
LitA.YoungR. H.ShafferM. (1971) Simple time reaction as a function of luminance for various wavelengths. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 397–399.
MansfieldR. J. W. (1973) Latency function in human vision. Vision Research, 13, 2219–2234.
56.
MattesonH. H. (1970) Effects of surround luminance on perceptual latency. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 60, 1125–1130.
57.
MattesonH. H. (1971) Effects of surround luminance on perceptual latency. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 61, 1169–1172.
58.
MayJ. G.MartinF.MacCanaF.LovegroveW. J. (1988) The effects of spatial frequency and temporal waveform on three measures of temporal processing. The Journal of General Psychology, 115, 293–306.
59.
MenendezA.LitA. (1983) Effects of test-flash and steady background luminance on simple visual reaction time (RT) and perceived simultaneity (PS). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 24, 5. (Abstract)
60.
MöcksJ.GasserT.PhamD. T. (1984) Variability of single visual evoked potentials evaluated by two new statistical tests. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 57, 571–580.
61.
MöcksJ.GasserT.PhamD. T.KöhlerW. (1987) Trial-to-trial variability of single event-related potentials: New concepts and results. International Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 25–32.
62.
NeumannO. (1982) Experimente zum Fehrer-Raab-Effekt und das Wetterwart-Modell der visuellen Maskierung. Bericht Nr. 24/1982, Psychologisches Institut der Ruhr-Universitäl Bochum, Arbeitseinheit Kongitionspsychologie.
63.
NeumannO.EsselmannU.KlotzW. (1993) Differential effects of visual-spatial attention on response latency and temporal-order judgment. Psychological Research, 56, 26–34.
64.
NeumannO.KlotzW. (1993) Motor responses to nonreportable, masked stimuli: Where is the limit of direct parameter specification? In MoscovichM.UmiltáC. (Eds.), Attention and performance XV. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 123–150.
65.
NeumannO.KochR.NiepelM.TappeT. (1992) Reaktionszeit und zeitliches Reihenfolgeurteil: Übereinstimmung oder Dissoziation?Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 39, 621–645.
66.
NeumannO.NiepelM.TappeT.KochR. (in press) Temporal order judgment and reaction time to visual and auditory stimuli of different intensities: Further evidence for dissociations. Perception & Psychophysics.
67.
NeumannO.TappeT.NiepelM. (1995) The effect of stimulus intensity and sensory modality on reaction time and temporal order judgment: A survey and an appraisal. (Unpublished manuscript)
68.
NiemiP. (1979) Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes. Acta Psychologica, 43, 299–312.
69.
NiselyS. J.WassermanG. S. (1989) Intensity dependence of perceived duration: Data, theories, and neural integration. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 483–496.
70.
NissenM. J. (1977) Stimulus intensity and information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 338–352.
PickH. L.WarrenD. H.HayJ. C. (1969) Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 203–205.
74.
PollackJ. D. (1968) Reaction time to different wavelengths at various luminance. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 17–24.
75.
PosnerM. I.NissenM. J.KleinR. M. (1976) Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.
76.
RoufsJ. A. J. (1963) Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research, 3, 81–91.
77.
RoufsJ. A. J. (1972) Dynamic properties of vision: II. Theoretical relationships between flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 12, 279–292.
78.
RoufsJ. A. J. (1974) Dynamic properties of vision: V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Research, 14, 853–869.
79.
RutschmannJ.LinkR. (1964) Perception of temporal order of stimuli differing in sense mode and simple reaction time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 345–352.
80.
SandersA. F. (1983) Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.
81.
SandersA. F.WertheimA. H. (1973) The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 201–206.
82.
SanfordA. J. (1971) Effects of changes in the intensity of white noise on simultaneity judgments and simple reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 296–303.
83.
SanfordA. J. (1974) Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology102, 443–446.
84.
ShapiroK. L.EgermanB.KieinR. M. (1984) Effect of arousal on human visual dominance. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 547–552.
85.
StelmachL. B.HerdmanC. M. (1991) Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 539–550.
86.
SternbergS.KnollR. L. (1973) The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In KornblumS. (Ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 629–685.
87.
SternbergS.KnollR. L.GatesB. A. (1971) Prior entry reexamined: Effect of attentional bias on order perception. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri.
88.
StoneS. A. (1926) Prior entry in the auditory-tactual complication. American Journal of Psychology, 37, 284–287.
89.
TappeT.NiepelM.NeumannO. (1994) A dissociation between reaction time to sinusoidal gratings and temporal-order judgment. Perception, 23, 335–347.
90.
TitchenerE. B. (1908) Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.
91.
TloczynskiJ. (1992) Visual dominance in a lateral plane motor learning task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 363–368.
92.
UenoT. (1976) Luminance-duration relation in reaction time to spectral stimuli. Vision Research, 16, 1099–1101.
93.
UenoT. (1977) Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels. Vision Research, 17, 227–232.
94.
UenoT. (1978) Temporal summation in human vision: Simple reaction time measurements. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 43–50.
95.
UenoT. (1979) Spatial summation in human vision: Simple reaction time measurements. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1023–1028.
96.
UlrichR. (1987) Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 224–239.
97.
UlrichR. (1988) Mathematisierte Theorienbildung in der kognitiven Psychologie. Tübingen: Habilitationsschrift.
98.
UlrichR.StapfK. H. (1984) A double response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 545–558.
99.
VanderhaeghenC.BertelsonP. (1974) The limits of prior entry: Nonsensitivity of temporal order judgments to selective preparation affecting choice reaction time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 569–572.
100.
VassilevA.ManahilovV.MitovD. (1973) Spatial frequency and the pattern onset-offset response. Vision Research, 23, 1417–1422.
101.
VassilevA.MitovD. (1976) Perception time and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 16, 89–92.
102.
VaughanH. G.Jr.CostaL. D.GildenL. (1966) The functional relation of visual response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research, 6, 645–656.
103.
WeingartenF. S. (1972) Wavelength effect on visual latency. Science, 176, 692–694.
104.
WeiskrantzL.WarringtonE. K.SandersM. D.MarshallJ. (1974) Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain, 97, 709–728.
105.
WhippleG. M. (1899) On nearly simultaneous clicks and flashes. American Journal of Psychology, 10, 880–886.
106.
WilliamsonS. J.KaufmanL.BrennerD. (1978) Latency of the neuromagnetic response of the human visual cortex. Vision Research, 18, 107–110.
107.
WilsonA. J.LitA. (1981) Effects of photopic annulus luminance level on reaction time and on the latency of evoked cortical potential responses to target flashes. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 1481–1486.
108.
ZacksJ. L. (1973) Estimation of the variability of the latency of response to brief flashes. Vision Research, 13, 829–835.
