The efficiency of two different instructional methods for improving the growth of handwriting quality in the upper grades of primary school was investigated in field experiments using a control-group design. No improvement in mean quality was found for a group of 38 children using a method based on copying exercises. A substantial improvement in mean quality, corresponding to about 1.4 SD, was found for 23 children using a method based on reintroduction of the letter forms explaining each form visually and verbally. It was concluded that the bottleneck in the development of handwriting quality in primary school is a mismatch between the instructional methods used and the perceptual ability of the children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbernethyB.SparrowW. A. (1992) The rise and fall of dominant paradigms in motor behaviour research. In SummersJ. J. (Ed.), Approaches to the study of motor control and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Pp. 3–45.
2.
AvresA. J. (1964) Southern California Motor Accuracy Test, manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
3.
AvresA. J. (1966) Southern California Figure-Ground Visual Perception Test, manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
4.
AyresL. P. (1917) Measuring scale for handwriting. New York: Russell Sage.
5.
BeeryK. E. (1967) Developmental Test of Visual-motor Integration. Chicago, IL: Follett.
6.
BenderL. (1938) The Bender visual-motor gestalt test for children. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Assn.
7.
CorcoranG. B. (1970) Language arts in the elementary school. New York: Ronald. P. 173.
8.
De HirschK.JanskyJ. J.LangfordW. S. (1966) Predicting reading failure. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
EnstromE. A. (1965) The decline of handwriting. Elementary School Journal, 66, 22–27.
10.
EnstromE. A. (1971) Handwriting, teaching of. In DeightonL. C. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of education. New York: Macmillan & Free Press. Pp. 297–303.
11.
FreemanF. N. (1915a) An analytical scale for judging handwriting. The Elementary School Journal, 15, 432–441.
12.
FreemanF. N. (1915b) Handwriting. In ParkerC. (Ed.), Minimum essentials in elementary school subjects—standards and current practices: the fourteenth yearbook. Chicago, IL: National Society for Study of Education. Pp. 61–77.
13.
GibsonE. J. (1963) Perceptual development: child psychology. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
14.
GibsonJ. J. (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
GibsonJ. J.GibsonE. J. (1955) Perceptual learning: differentiation or enrichment. Psychological Review, 62, 32–41.
16.
GlaserR. (1963) Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: some questions. American Psychologist, 18, 519–521.
17.
GroffP. J. (1961) New speeds of handwriting. Elementary English, 38, 564–565.
18.
GroffP. J. (1964) Who are the better writers—the left-handed or the right-handed?Elementary School Journal, 65, 92–96.
19.
GroffP. J. (1975) The future of legibility. Elementary English, 52, 205–212, 220.
20.
HambletonR. K.NovickM. R. (1973) Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 159–170.
21.
Hamstra-BletzL.BlöteA. W. (1990) Development of handwriting in primary school: a longitudinal study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 759–770.
22.
HaysD. (1982) Handwriting practice: the effects of perceptual prompts. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 169–172.
23.
HerrickV. E.OkadaN. (1963) The present scene: practices in the teaching of handwriting in the United States. In HerrickV. E. (Ed.), New horizons for research in handwriting. Madison, WI: Univer. of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 17–32.
24.
KarlsdottirR. (1993) Comparison of results from tracking training and classroom instruction used as remedial measures in writing instruction in sixth gradeBIGS, 7, 27–29.
25.
KarlsdottirR. (1996) Development of cursive handwriting quality. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian Univer. of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
26.
MælandA. F.KarlsdottirR. (1991) Development of reading, spelling, and writing skills from third to sixth grade in normal and dysgraphic children. In WannJ.WingA. M.SøvikN. (Eds.), Development of graphic skills. London: Academic Press. Pp. 179–189.
27.
McCarthyL. (1977) A child learns the alphabet. Visible Language, 11, 271–284.
28.
ReitanR. M.DavisonL. A. (1974) Clinical neuropsychology: current states and applications. Washington, DC: Winston. Pp. 363–384.
29.
SassoonR. (1991) The effect of teachers' personal handwriting on their reproduction of school handwriting models. In WannJ.WingA. M.SøvikN. (Eds.), Development of graphic skills. London: Academic Press. Pp. 151–161.
30.
SøvikN. (1975) Developmental cybernetics of handwriting and graphic behavior. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
31.
SøvikN. (1976) The effects of different principles of instruction in children's copying performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 45, 38–45.
32.
SøvikN.ArntzenO.KarlsdottirR. (1993) Relations between writing speed and some other parameters in handwriting. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 25, 133–150.
33.
SternbergS. (1969) The discovery of processing stages: extention of Donders' method. In KlosterW. G. (Ed.), Attention and performance, II. Amsterdam: North Holland. Pp. 276–315.
34.
TrankellA. (1961) Skrivhandvalets inverknan på handstilen. In EdfeldtÅ.TrankellA. (Eds.), Manuell skriving: experimentelle studier. Stockholm: Liber. Pp. 78–101.
35.
WheelerM. E. (1972) Untutored acquisition of writing skill. Dissertation Abstracts, 32, 5503.
36.
ZivianiJ. (1984) Some elaborations on handwriting speed in 7– to 14-year-olds. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 535–539.
