Retest Reliability of the Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery

Abstract

The Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery: English Form was administered to 152 of the 478 students beginning medical studies at an Australian university in 1990 and 1991. Two years after admission 147 of the students were available for retest. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from .70 to .85 for the 8 subtests, .83 to .91 for the three cluster scores, and the coefficient for the Broad Language Cluster score was .95. The sample had deliberately over-represented students low in English language proficiency but the reliability coefficients were only slightly reduced when this bias was corrected by forming a representative sample of 72 students. The mean incremental gain on the Broad Language Cluster of 1.8 was statistically significant and corresponded closely to the 2.0 predicted from the test norms for a 2-year developmental period. These results support previous reports of the excellent psychometric properties of this instrument.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachman

L. F.

Davidson

Foulkes

(1990) A comparison of the abilities measured by the Cambridge and Educational Testing Service EFL test batteries. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1, 30–55.

Cummings

J. A.

(1985) Review of Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. In Mitchell

J. V.

(Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. 2. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute. Pp. 1759–1762.

Hayes

S. C.

Farnill

(1992) A study of the concurrent validity of the Screening Test of Adolescent Language. Psychological Reports, 71, 175–178.

Hayes

S. C.

Farnill

(1993) Medical training and English language proficiency. Medical Education, 27, 6–14.

Hayes

S. C.

Farnill

Sefton

A. J.

(1994) Improving English communication skills of preclinical medical students. Annals of Community-Oriented Education, 7, 317–327.

Hugo

(1994) Introduction. In Wooden

Holton

Hugo

Sloan

(Eds.), Australian immigration: A survey of the issues. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Pp. 1–29.

Ingram

D. E.

(1984) Introduction to the ASLPR. In Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Eds.), Australian second language proficiency ratings. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Pp. 2–30.

Kaufman

A. S.

(1985) Review of Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. In Mitchell

J. V.

(Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. 2. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute. Pp. 1762–1765.

Noyce

(1985) Review of Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery. In Mitchell

J. V.

(Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. 2. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute. Pp. 1765–1767.

10.

Oller

J. W.

Spolsky

(1979) The Test of English as a Foreign Language. In Spolsky

(Ed.), Papers in applied linguistics: Advances in language testing series: 1. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics. Pp. 92–100.

11.

Prather

E. M.

Breecher

S. V. A.

Stafford

M. L.

Wallace

E. M.

(1980) Screening Test of Adolescent Language. Seattle, WA: Univer. of Washington Press.

12.

Quinn

(1985) Review of Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery. In Mitchell

J. V.

(Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Vol. 2. Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute. P. 1767.

13.

Sefton

A. J.

(1990) Selection of medical students. Medical Journal of Australia, 153, 440–441.

14.

Wesche

M. B.

(1987) Second language performance testing: The Ontario Test of ESL as an example. Language Testing, 4, 28–47.

15.

Woodcock

R. W.

(1978) Development and standardization of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corp.

16.

Woodcock

R. W.

(1984) Examiner's manual, Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery—English Form. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.