This study examined the influence of a female instructor's clothing style on students' perceptions of an instructor's characteristics. Social perception provided the theoretical framework. Formality of clothing style, students' clothing interest, and students' gender were the independent variables. Perception of the instructor's characteristics was the dependent variable. A 25-item questionnaire was administered to 216 college students from three universities. Perceptions of the instructor's characteristics varied significantly with formality of clothing style. The students' clothing interest influenced perceptions to some extent; gender of students did not.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BuckleyH. M. (1983) Attraction toward a stranger as a linear function of similarity in dress. Home Economics Research Journal, 12, 25–34.
2.
BuckleyH. M., & RoachM. E. (1981) Attraction as a function of attitudes and dress. Home Economics Research Journal, 10, 88–97.
3.
ButlerS., & RoeselK. (1989) Research note: the influence of dress on students' perceptions of teacher characteristics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(3), 57–59.
4.
ButlerS., & RoeselK. (1991) Students' perceptions of male teachers: effects of teacher's dress and students' characteristics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 943–951.
5.
ChickeringA. (1969) Education and identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
CreekmoreA. M. (1971) Methods of measuring clothing variables. Michigan Agriculture Experiment Station Project No. 738, Michigan State Univer.
7.
DamhorstM. L. (1984–85) Meanings of clothing cues in social context. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 3(2), 39–48.
8.
DavisL. L. (1985) Perceived somatotype, body-cathexis, and attitudes toward clothing among college females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1199–1205.
9.
DavisL. L., & LennonS. J. (1988) Social cognition and the study of clothing and human behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 175–186.
10.
GurelL. M. (1974) Dimensions of clothing interest based on factor analysis of Creekmore's 1968 clothing measure. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of North Carolina at Greensboro)
11.
GurelL. M., & GurelL. (1979) Clothing interest: conceptualization and measurement. Home Economics Research Journal, 7, 274–282.
12.
KaiserS. B. (1983–84) Toward a contextual social psychology of clothing: a synthesis of symbolic interactionist and cognitive theoretical perspectives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 5(3), 1–8.
13.
KaiserS. B. (1990) The social psychology of clothing. New York: Macmillan.
14.
LapitskyM., & SmithC. M. (1981) Impact of clothing on impressions of personal characteristics and writing ability. Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 327–335.
15.
LennonS. J., & DavisL. L. (1989) Clothing and human behavior from a social cognitive framework: Part I. Theoretical perspectives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 7(4), 41–48.
16.
LittrellM. A., & BergerE. A. (1985–86) Perceiver's occupation and client's grooming: influence on person perception. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 4(2), 48–55.
17.
PetersonT. C., & JohnsonM. (1985) Effects of teachers' style of dress on high school students' rating of teacher characteristics. Paper presented to the Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing Proceedings: national meeting. P. 223.
18.
ReederE. N., & KingA. C. (1984) Are teachers dressing for success?Illinois Teacher, 27, 212–213.
19.
RollmanS. A. (1980) Some effects of teachers' style of dress. ERIC Document ED 184 191, Microfiche Edition.
