As there are multiple forms of the Selective Reminding Test, it is critical to consider the implications of using published normative data in interpretation of results as different forms of administration may not be equivalent in regards to the domain of memory assessed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EhrenreichJ. H. (1995) Normative data for adults on a short form of the Selective Reminding Test. Psychological Reports, 76, 387–390.
2.
HannayH. J., & LevinH. S. (1985) Selective Reminding Test: an administration of the equivalence of four forms. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7, 251–263.
3.
KraemerH. C.PeabodyC. A.TinklenbergJ. R., & YesavageJ. A. (1983) Mathematical and empirical development of a test of memory for clinical and research use. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 367–380.
4.
MasurD. M.FuldP. A.BlauA. D.ThalL. J.LevinH. S., & AronsonM. K. (1989) Distinguishing normal and demented elderly with the Selective Reminding Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 615–630.
5.
SmithR. L.GoodeK. T.La MarcheJ. A., & BollT. J. (in press) Selective Reminding Test short form administration: a comparison of two through twelve trials. Psychological Assessment.
