We present evidence for an intuitive scaling rule by which people gauge the likelihood of coincidences. This rule is essentially linear in nature and becomes increasingly unreliable as the “outlandishness” of a coincidence grows, the latter being a demonstrably nonlinear phenomenon. We suggest that the existence of this linear scaling rule may help explain why so many people are inappropriately surprised by coincidences.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackmoreS. J.TrosciankoT. (1985) Belief in the paranormal: probability judgements, illusory control and the “chance baseline shift.”British Journal of Psychology, 76, 459–468.
2.
BrüggerP.LandisT.RegardM. (1990) A sheep-goat effect in repetition avoidance: extrasensory perception as an effect of subjective probability. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 455–468.
3.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (Eds.) (1982) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: The University Press.
4.
MatthewsR. A. J. (1993) The law of credulity. Mathematics Gazette, 77, 327–328.
5.
SutherlandS. (1992) Irrationality: the enemy within. London: Constable.
