Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1995-6
Electromyographic Effects of Fatigue and Task Repetition on the Validity of Estimates of Strong and Weak Muscles in Applied Kinesiological Muscle-Testing Procedures
The study investigated the effects of fatigue and task repetition on the relationship between integrated electromyogram and force output during subjective clinical testing of upper extremity muscles. Muscles were studied under two conditions differing in the nature and duration of constant force production (SHORT-F) and (LONG-F). The findings included a significant relationship between force output and integrated EMG, a significant increase in efficiency of muscle activity with task repetition, and significant difference between Force/integrated EMG ratios for muscles labeled “Strong” and “Weak” in the LONG-F condition. This supports Smith's 1974 notion that practice results in increased muscular efficiency. With fatigue, integrated EMG activity increased strongly and functional (force) output of the muscle remained stable or decreased. Fatigue results in a less efficient muscle process. Muscles subjectively testing “Weak” or “Strong” yield effects significantly different from fatigue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BasmajianJ. V. (1977) Learned control of single motor units. In SchwartzG. E.BeattyJ. (Eds.), Biofeedback: Therapy and research. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 42–47.
2.
BrooksV. B. (1986) The neural basis of motor control. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
3.
Dataq Instruments. (1989) Windaq System Software. Akron, OH: Dataq Instruments.
4.
DelagiE. F.PerottoA. (1980) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer: The limbs. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
5.
DeVriesH. A. (1968) “Efficiency of electrical activity” as a physiological measure of the functional state of muscle tissue. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 47, 10–22.
6.
EdwardsR. G.LippoldO. C. J. (1956) The relation between force and integrated electrical activity in fatigued muscle. Journal of Physiology, London, 132, 677–681.
7.
GottliebG. L.AgarwalG. C. (1970) Filtering of electromyographic signals. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 49, 142–146.
8.
KasserR. J.LehrR. P. (1979) Electromyographic frequency response of the biceps brachii in an isometric contraction to fatigue. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 19, 175–181.
9.
KendallH. O.KendallF. P.WadsworthG. E. (1978) Muscles testing and function. (2nd ed.) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
10.
KomiR. V.BuskirkE. R. (1970) Reproducibility of electromyographic measurement with inserted wire electrodes and surface electrodes. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 4, 357–367.
11.
LeismanG. (1988) A neuropsychology of limb segment information transmission capacity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 320.
12.
LeismanG. (1989a) Cybernetic model of psychophysiological pathways: II. Consciousness of effort and kinesthesia. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 12, 174–191.
13.
LeismanG. (1989b) Cybernetic model of psychophysiological pathways: III. Impairment of consciousness of effort and kinesthesia. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 12, 257–265.
14.
LeismanG. (1989c) Limb segment information transmission capacity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 12, 3–9.
15.
LeismanG.ShambaughP.FerentzA. (1989) Somatosensory evoked potential changes in muscle testing. International Journal of Neuroscience, 45, 143–151.
16.
LeismanG.VitoriR. (1990) Limb segment information transmission capacity infers integrity of spinothalamic tracts and cortical visuo-motor control. International Journal of Neuroscience, 50, 175–183.
17.
LippoldO. C. J.RedfearnJ. W. T.VucoJ. (1960) The electromyography of fatigue. Ergonomics, 3, 121–131.
18.
LudwigD. A. (1982) EMG changes during acquisition of a motor skill. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 61, 229–243.
19.
MetzA. M. (1971) Änderungen der myoelektrischen Aktivität während eines senomotorischen leren Prozesses. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 178, 51–88.
20.
Milner-BrownH. S.SteinR. B. (1975) The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. Journal of Physiology, London, 246, 549–569.
21.
MooreA. D. (1967) Synthesized EMG waves and their implications. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 46, 1302–1316.
22.
MoritaniT.DeVriesH. A. (1978) Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 78, 263–277.
23.
MulderT.HulstijnW. (1984) Sensory feedback therapy and theoretical knowledge of motor control and learning. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 63, 226–244.
24.
MulderT.HulstijnW. (1985) Sensory feedback and the learning of a novel motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 110–128.
25.
SeidelH.BayerH.BräuerD. (1987) Electromyographic evaluation of back muscle fatigue with repeated sustained contractions of different strengths. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 56, 592–602.
26.
SmithL. E. (1974) Strength increments following massed and distributed practice relative to motor learning. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 6, 154–157.
27.
ViitasaloJ. T.KomiP. V. (1978) Interrelationships of EMG signal characteristics at different levels of muscle tension and during fatigue. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 18, 167–178.
28.
WaltherD. S. (1981) Applied kinesiology. Vol. I. Basic procedures and muscle testing. Pueblo, CO: Systems D.C.
29.
WinterD. A.YackH. A. (1987) EMG profiles during normal walking: Stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67, 402–411.
30.
ZwartsM. J.Arendt-NielsenL. (1988) The influence of force and circulation on average muscle fiber conduction velocity during local muscle fatigue. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 58, 278–283.
