Agreement between two methods of computing the fractal dimensions of complex figures was examined. 16 complex figures were scanned and the fractal dimensions were computed under two conditions. There was no significant difference between the two methods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenderL. (1938) A Visual-motor Gestalt Test and its clinical use. American Orthopsychiatry Association Research Monographs, No. 3.
2.
BiglerE. D. (1990) Traumatic brain injury: mechanisms of damage, assessment, intervention, and outcome. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
3.
LacksP. (1984) Bender-Gestalt screening for brain dysfunction. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
4.
LezakM. D. (1983) Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
5.
LiebovitchL. S., & TothT. (1989) A fasts algorithm to determine fractal dimensions by box counting. Physics Letters A, 141, 386–390.
6.
OliverD. (1992) Fractal vision. [Computer program], Wolcott, VT: Cedar Software.
7.
SarraelliJ. J., & DiFalcoP. (1992) FD3 Fractal dimension program. Turlock, CA: Center for Telecommunications Courses.
8.
TolorA., & BranniganG. C. (1980) Research and clinical applications of the Bender-Gestalt test. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
