Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Hull-Spence theory of anxiety drive (A) was tested in a psychomotor learning situation in which both correct responses (R +) and competing responses (R -) were evoked by the task. Measures of A-Trait and A-State were obtained from 151 women and 52 men, all of whom were then exposed to a sequence of 16 trials on a mirror-tracking task presented either continuously or with 2-min. intertrial intervals. Analyses of the effects of A were then performed on samples of 68 women and 16 men drawn from the tails of the A distributions. Theoretical predictions about the effects of A on initial scores and performance trends of both R + and R - were strongly supported, somewhat more so within the A-State classification than within the A-Trait classification owing to the larger amount of variance accounted for. Analyses involving intermediate levels of A showed that R + was a monotonic and essentially linear function of A.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carron

A. V.

(1971) Reactions to “Anxiety and Motor Behavior.” Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 181–188.

Hull

C. L.

(1943) Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Cenrury-Crofts.

Manning

W. H.

DuBois

P. H.

(1962) Correlation methods in research on human learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 287–321.

Marteniuk

R. G.

(1971) Two factors to be considered in the design of experiments in anxiety and motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 189–192.

Martens

(1971) Anxiety and motor behavior: a review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 151–179.

Melton

A. W.

(1947) Apparatus tests. AAF Aviation Psychology Program, Research Report No. 4 Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Miller

N. E.

(1948) Studies of fear as an acquirable drive: 1. Fear as motivation and fear reduction as reinforcement in the learning of new responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 89–101.

Mowrer

O. H.

(1939) A stimulus response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent. Psychological Review, 46, 553–565.

Noble

C. E.

Hays

J. R.

(1966) Discrimination reaction performance as a function of anxiety and sex parameters. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1267–1278.

10.

Prokasy

W. F.

(1967) Do D and H multiply to determine performance in human conditioning? Psychological Bulletin, 67, 368–377.

11.

Spence

J. T.

(1971) What can you say about a twenty-year-old theory that won't die? Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 193–203.

12.

Spence

J. T.

Spence

K. W.

(1966) The motivational components of manifest anxiety: drive and drive stimuli. In Spielberger

C. D.

(Ed.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 291–326.

13.

Spence

K. W.

(1958) A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations. American Psychologist, 13, 131–141.

14.

Spence

K. W.

(1964) Anxiety (drive) level and performance in eyelid conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 129–139.

15.

Spielberger

C. D.

(1971) Trait-state anxiety and motor behavior. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 265–279.

16.

Spielberger

C. D.

Gorsuch

R. L.

Lushene

R. E.

(1970) The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (test manual). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.

17.

Taylor

J. A.

(1953) A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285–290.

18.

Taylor

J. A.

(1956) Drive theory and manifest anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 303–320.

19.

Taylor

J. A.

Rechtshaffen

(1959) Manifest anxiety and reversed alphabet printing. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 221–224.

20.

Underwood

B. J.

(1966) Motor skills learning and verbal learning: some observations. In Bilodeau

E. A.

(Ed.), Acquisition of skill. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 486–516.

Motivational Effects of Anxiety on Psychomotor Performance

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References