This study investigated performance on a lexical decision task as a function of whether subjects were tested individually or in a group session. The social loafing construct was examined as a possible explanation for reduced performance when subjects were not individually tested. Two groups of 44 subjects were tested using a computer-based version of a lexical decision task in which target words and nonwords were responded to as fast as possible. The main effect of group versus individual administration was significant. While both groups showed significant graphemic priming and a significant effect between words and nonwords, there was no significant interaction between group and priming condition. These results suggest that the negative effects of social loafing are strictly additive and do not appear to interact with automatic processes recruited during word recognition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntosS. J. (1979) Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 527–545.
2.
BanduraA. (1977) Self-efficacy theory: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
3.
BanduraA. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1989) Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Coal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 19–85.
5.
ForsterK. I. (1976) Accessing the mental lexicon. In WalesR. J.WalkerE. (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms. New York: North Holland. Pp. 257–287.
6.
ForsterK. I.DavisC.SchoknechtC.CarterR. (1987) Masked priming with gra-phemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 221–252.
7.
FrancisW. N.KučeraH. (1982) Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
HarkinsS. G.JacksonJ. (1985) The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457–465.
9.
HarktnsS. G.PettyR. (1982) Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.
10.
HarkinsS. G.SzymanskiK. (1989) Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934–941.
11.
HinszV. B. (1991) Individual versus group decision making: Social comparison in goals for individual task performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 987–1003.
12.
InghamA. G.LevtngerG.GravesJ.PeckhamV. (1974) The Ringelmann effect; studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371–384.
13.
JacksonJ. M.WilliamsK. D. (1985) Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937–942.
14.
JacobyL. L.CraikF. I. M. (1979) Effects of elaboration of processing at encoding and retrieval: Trace distinctiveness and recovery of initial context. In CermakL. S.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 1–21.
15.
KerrN. L.BruunS. E. (1981) Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224–231.
16.
KihlstromJ. F. (1987) The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237, 1445–1452.
17.
KravitzD. A.MartinB. (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 936–941.
18.
LataneB.WilliamsK. D.HarkjnsS. G. (1979) Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–832.
19.
NeelyJ. H. (1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibition-less spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
20.
PratarelliM. E. (1991) Prosody and semantic activation: A combined electrophysiological and behavioral study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Univer. of Southern California.
21.
SannaL. J. (1992) Self-efficacy theory: Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774–786.
22.
SeidenbergM. S. (1985) The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition. In BesnerD.WalkerT.MacKinnonG. E. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 199–252.
23.
WilliamsK. D.KarauS. J. (1991) Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of coworker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570–581.
