45 subjects employing procedures for continuous, intermittent, or faded knowledge of results exhibited for drawing a 7.5-cm line no significant difference in acquisition, retention, or transfer to a 5-cm line.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BilodeauE. A.BilodeauI. M. (1961) Motor skills learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 379–383.
2.
NewellK. M. (1974) Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 235–244.
3.
SalmoniA. W.SchmidtR. A.WalterC. B. (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.
4.
SchmidtR. A. (1988) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
5.
SheaC. H.ShebilskeW. L.WorchelS. (1992) Motor learning and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
WinsteinC. J.SchmidtR. A. (1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677–691.
7.
WulfG.SchmidtR. A. (1989) The learning of generalized motor programs: reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748–757.
