The purpose of this investigation was to examine the magnitude and reliability of strength measures on the Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester for individuals with mental retardation. 17 subjects were given six trials with the dominant and nondominant flexor and extensor muscle groups. No significant differences were found between dominant and nondominant muscle groups by side or by muscle group. Interclass correlations ranged from .96 to .98 for six and three trials, respectively. It was concluded that the test was appropriate for reliably assessing strength in this population and that these individuals can achieve a sufficient magnitude on three trials for a reliable measure of strength.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alabama State Department of Education. (1990) Division of Special Education Services Administrative Policy Manual Bulletin No. 36.
2.
BaumgartnerT.HorvatM. (1988) Problems in measuring physical and motor performance of the handicapped. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 59, 48–52.
3.
BaumgartnerT.JacksonA. (1991) Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science. (4th ed.) Dubuque, IA: Brown.
4.
BohannonR. W. (1987) Hand-held dynamometry: stability of muscle strength over multiple measurements. Clinical Biomechanics, 2, 74–77.
5.
BohannonR. W. (1990) Muscle strength testing with hand-held dynamometers. In AmundsenL. R. (Ed.), Muscle strength testing: instrumented and noninstrumented systems. New York: Churchill Livingstone. Pp. 69–85.
6.
BohannonR. W.SaundersN. (1990) Hand-held dynamometry: a single trial may be adequate for measuring muscle strength in healthy individuals. Physiotherapy Canada, 42, 6–9.
7.
BruininksR. H. (1974) Physical and motor development of retarded persons. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), International review of research on mental retardation. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 209–261.
8.
BruininksR. H. (1978) Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
9.
CroceR.HorvatM. (1992) Effects of reinforcement based exercise on fitness and work productivity in adults with mental retardation. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 148–178.
10.
CroceR.HorvatM.RoswalG. (submitted) Effects of exercise duration and fitness level on speed and accuracy of problem solving in individuals with mental retardation. (Manuscript submitted for publication)
11.
KendallF. P.McCrearyE. K. (1983) Muscles: testing and function. (3rd ed) Baltimore, MD: Williams & Willems.
12.
KeppelG. (1982) Design and analysis: a researchers' handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
LavayB.ReidG.Cressler-ChavizM. (1990) Measuring the cardiovascular endurance of persons with mental retardation: a critical review. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 18, 263–290.
14.
NewellK. M. (1985) Motor skill acquisition and mental retardation: overview of traditional and current orientations. In ClarkJ.HumphreyJ. (Eds.), Motor development: current selected research. Princeton, NJ: Prevention Book Co. Pp. 183–191.
15.
NordgrenB.BackstromL. (1971) Correlations between muscular strength and industrial work performance in mentally retarded persons. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica (Suppl.), 277, 122–126.
16.
PateR.ShepherdR. (1987) Characteristics of physical fitness in youth. In GisolfiC. V.LambD. (Eds.), Perspectives in exercise science and sports medicine. Indianapolis, IN: Benchmark Press. Pp. 1–45.
17.
PitettiK. (1990) A reliable isokinetic strength test for arm and leg musculature for mild mentally retarded adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 669–672.
18.
ShepherdR. J. (1990) Fitness in special populations. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
19.
SudgenD.KeoghJ. (1990) Problems in movement skill development. Columbia, SC: Univer. of South Carolina Press.
20.
WoodsJ. A.PateR. R.BurgessM. L. (1992) Correlates to performance on field tests of muscular strength. Pediatric Exercise Science, 4, 302–311.
